You and I agree on this but it sure seems most of the media does not. There is zero evidence so far that he was in any way motivated by the right and similar rhetoric has come from the left. The majority of the media has decided, despite the above, that it is "fair" to discuss what hypothetical responsibility the political right should bear. It appears to me they have decided to play lip service to the facts as we currently know them while doing what they can to blame the right.

Maybe it is happening and I haven't come across it, but the political side of this discussion hasn't suggested that this guy did this because he is a lefty and was motivated by the left. What I have seen is "one side" saying he was a righty motivated by the right while the "other side" says he wasn't a righty, he may even have been a lefty (without saying that motivated him to do this), but his politics had nothing to do with this. I see that as a large distinction between the two sides of the discussion.

Are you telling me people post moronic things on the internet? My worldview has been shattered.

The current political climate tends to fuel this, or be fuelled by it (chicken and the egg scenario). The guy attacked a Democrat, so the backlash is toward Republicans. The way that I see it, it's similar to people who blame religion for people who shoot abortion doctors, or blow up troops with IEDs. A marginal personality is a marginal personality. If politics didn't 'make' him kill someone then it would have been demonic rock music, TV, or violent video games.

Quite simply put, someone with his head screwed on straight doesn't do shit like that.

Pretty much :lol:

The thing is that sort of comment doesn't exactly douse the political fires, now does it? Making that sort of comment, even 'just' on the internet, isn't only stupid, it's FUCKING stupid.

I'd like to think that you are right but I just don't. Most of the media seems to do an OK job when reporting facts, but with this story there really aren't many facts to report. The story is too big for the media to deal with other stories until more facts come in though. Since they still have to fill airtime/pages but they have no "news" to fill it with they resort to editorializing which is where they really fall down.

This is nothing but pure speculation on my part, but if this had been a Republican I believe the backlash would still be against Republicans. My theory is we would be hearing about how nobody deserves this and it isn't an excuse, but violence begets violence and the violent imagery from the right created an atmosphere where this kind of attack could happen. It would be nice if my theory was way off base and reporters avoided trying to place blame with absolutely nothing to back it up, but I really don't think that would happen and it certainly hasn't happened in this case.

I don't think those comments really inflame the political fires either though. To paraphrase what you said above, someone with their head screwed on straight isn't going to be affected by that kind of garbage to begin with. People with any sense recognize that kind of crap as exactly that, crap.

Paraphrase a few of the comments you recall.

The comment section has been disabled for the video.

"The Joos are the devil!"

That's definitely one of the themes; assholes saying that she's a Jew and deserves to die. Then there were the comments about how some hoped that the "socialist bitch would just die." After reading them, I was rather sick. When I said "chlorine for the gene pool", I really meant hydrochloric acid.

If it was just one comment, then I would just shrug it off. It was dozens, most by different user accounts (some repeats).

Am I the only one who thinks this kid might be autistic/aspergers at least a little bit?

Assburger w/cheese! fo sho!

VERY sad!:td:

No, I agree.

He looks just like Avatards avatar.

http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_l...10110_main.jpg