OneSickPsycho |
05-17-2011 12:31 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex
(Post 470371)
They feel the need to inure people to torture so they subject them to a form that leaves no lasting physical injury, when performed under carefully controlled conditions. Ironically it also has little chance of causing lasting PSYCHOLOGICAL injury, because it's being performed by 'friendlies.'
Again, I suggest that you partake of it while in the 'care' of people, whom you don't know.
|
And the form that's used for interrogation does leave lasting physical injury?
For the psychological standpoint, that's pretty subjective... 1) the guys they waterboarded were trained to resist such things, mitigating the psychological impacts long term 2) they were pretty fucked in the head to begin with... like comparing walking a normal, well adjusted person onto a gruesome battlefield... they'd obviously have long term psychological damage, but put Charles Manson out there and watch him finger paint with entrails. Poor comparison to begin with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by askmrjesus
(Post 470374)
So, you'd be cool with me waterbording your mom, right?
Well, the Gestapo probably had a couple of guys that made a mean Strudel, but the others, not so much.
JC
|
No, I wouldn't be cool with you waterboarding my mom. I also wouldn't be cool with you shooting my mom in the face, but if you caught one of these guys during the raid on Bin Laden's compound... no biggie.
Again, you guys are making terrible comparisons... It's not like they waterboarded hundreds of random people... They did it to guys who were trained specifically to resist that sort of thing, are fucked in the head to begin with, etc...
|