Let me clarify that the point of this thread was really targeted towards people who CARE about strips and try to use them as a gauge for their/other's ability/progress or lack thereof.
People who know anything or have any skill know that there are tons of factors at play.
That all being said, I'm glad this sparked some good old-fashioned motorcycle technique conversation, which was my intention.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubbs
(Post 35840)
I don't think he said that.. What I think he said was
|
Kyle knows that's not what I meant, he was just being a douche.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeonspeedRT
(Post 36000)
Well said. Anyone who thinks Chicken strips are a measure of how good a rider is, needs to learn how to ride themselves.
If you have no Chicken strips, it basically means you are using every little bit of traction the tire can give you.
Basically on the street that means you have no out. You have no more useable traction coming through a corner, if a panic situation was to occur.
|
I totally agree with your first sentence.
However, I'm with r!der, and disagree with the second part. When the chicken strip is just gone, you are just getting the contact patch to the side of the tire. You don't need that entire patch to maintain traction... you need MUCH less... you can go a lot further than that point.
I do understand what you meant though, regarding less available traction and less room to account for road issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeonspeedRT
(Post 36138)
My reason for saying that.....If you are taking a hard corner, and are using every bit of the side of that tire where else can you go?
|
His point was that the lack of chicken strips does not correlate to using your every bit of available traction, that's all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by r!der
(Post 36153)
Does this mean you're at max lean? I'm thinking no, there's prob more lean, the contact patch is just getting smaller.
|
You're right. And your TD shots looked good and faster than me, so you must be getting something right :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip
(Post 36157)
r!der is right, just cause your tire is fully worn doesn't mean you are at full lean. Take my av or some of the other guys av's that aren't of rossi or some other pro racer. With that lean angle, it will wear the tire completely with no chickenstrip, but I still have plenty left to go before my tire losses traction. No chicken strips, doesn't mean you are using the tire to the very edge of it's limit.
|
Ok now I feel like we have a broken record. But yeah, that's it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip
(Post 36169)
Yeah front chicken strips you really got to crank it over. The profile on the powers is easy enough to get it for me, the corsa IIIs are a lot tougher because there profile is a lot steeper.
|
I had them gone on the front tire on my OEMs... I don't expect that to occur on the corsa IIIs... we'll see.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mudpuppy
(Post 36176)
hmm i don't really agree here.. i think you have more traction at full lean but i need someone much smarter than me to confirm.. the contact patch straight up and down is less i believe.. but straight up and down you are more stable due to gravity not trying to pull you down.. the only way to adjust is lean more or get it upright and use brake..
|
The rear contact patch when straight up and down depends on what you are doing. Under hard braking it's small or maybe even non-existent. When you're accelerating the rear squats and you get a big old patch.
That patch under accel is about the same size of the one you get when leaned over... the difference is that you are turning and the centripetal forces of cornering are perpendicular to gravity as well as your accel forces (for a flat turn at least). So you are relying entirely on friction in two dimensions to keep you on the bike instead of just one..