All teachers fired at Rhode Island school
 

All teachers fired at Rhode Island school
From Randi Kaye, CNN's AC360°
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Board votes to discharge all teachers, other educators at Central Falls High School

District, union failed to reach agreement for teachers to spend more time with students

Union president says teachers scapegoated, union will fight to reinstate them

Terminations will go into effect in the next school year

(CNN) -- A school board in Rhode Island has voted to fire all teachers at a struggling high school, a dramatic and controversial plan aimed at shoring up education in a poverty-ridden school district.

In a 5-2 vote Tuesday night, the board approved the plan by Frances Gallo, superintendent at Central Falls School District, to discharge the teachers at Central Falls High School.

The firings came after the district said it failed to reach an agreement with the teachers' union on a plan for the instructors to spend more time with students to improve test scores.

Among those affected are the school's 74 classroom teachers and other educators, such as guidance counselors and reading specialists, the union said.

The terminations will go into effect in the next school year.

A union spokesman called the firings "drastic" and cited a 21 percent rise in reading scores and a 3 percent hike in math scores in two years.

Central Falls High is one of the lowest-performing schools in Rhode Island. It is in a community where median income is $22,000, census figures show.

Of the 800 students, 65 percent are Hispanic, and for most of them, English is a second language. Half of the students are failing every subject, with 55 percent skilled in reading and 7 percent proficient in math, officials said.

In a proposal based on federal guidelines, Gallo asked teachers to work a longer school day of seven hours and tutor students weekly for one hour outside of school time.

She also proposed teachers have lunch with students often, meet for 90 minutes every week to discuss education and set aside two weeks during summer break for paid professional development.

The union spokesman said the teachers had accepted most of the changes but wanted to work out compensation for the extra hours of work.

The superintendent said the two sides could not agree on a pay rate.

Under new federal requirements for school reform, low-performing schools have several options for shaping up. One is called the transformation model, which includes a series of changes that teachers just agree to adopt.

When the negotiations on those changes failed at Central Falls High, the superintendent switched to another option: the turnaround model, which means firing every teacher at a troubled school.

Central Falls High teacher Kathy May said she is disheartened. "I feel like, after 20 years, I can see some progress beginning to be made. And I'm sad that we're not going to be around to follow that through, to push that forward," May said.

Gallo -- who said Rhode Island law requires notice must be given by March 1 -- said the problem isn't solely the fault of teachers and it wasn't her preference to make the move.

She indicated that some teachers might be rehired.

"When we had to move from the transformation model, the next best move was the turnaround model. And that requires us to remove the teachers and rehire, of those who reapply, up to 50 percent," she said.

"This is a major move, for a very significant reason, and that being that we couldn't hone in on the assurances we needed for the transformation model."

Asked what would happen if the teachers' union accepted the original terms, Gallo said it would be difficult to go back, but that such a move can't be discounted.

"And if, as we approach 120 days of planning as we move forward, if indeed something of that effect comes around, then I still think we have a lot of doors that could be opened," she said.

At a community rally before Tuesday's school board meeting, supporters of the teachers slammed the plan.

Jane Sessums, president of the Central Falls Teachers Union, said teachers have been "unfairly targeted" and scapegoated and the union will fight to have them reinstated.

"We want genuine reforms, not quick fixes that do nothing but create a wedge between teachers, our school and our community," Sessums said. She added that "teachers have agreed to numerous solutions and reforms."

George McLaughlin, a guidance counselor who was fired along with his wife, a chemistry teacher, said the school has been inaccurately cast as a place with low graduation rates.

"We have the most transient population in this state. Nobody comes close to us. So when they say that 50 percent of the people graduate, a very high percentage of our students leave our school. They return. They leave again. They go back to other countries," he said

McLaughlin said three times as many of the school's students are accepted to colleges now than they were five years ago.

He also was critical of the superintendent, saying Gallo "has been with us for a little more than three years."

McLaughlin said if Gallo were willing to negotiate and listen to former Sen. Lincoln Chafee, R-Rhode Island, who offered to mediate, "maybe we could resolve this instead of causing more trauma to us."

McLaughlin said the negotiations were about job security, not pay, and said teachers are ready to resume talks.








Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/02/24/rho...achers/?hpt=T2

I like the idea. They can still rehire those teacher who give a crap while getting rid of the dead weight.

In concept sure... But it sets a very dangerous precedent...

Not really. It appears that the state had that plan in place. She's just the first to use it. It appears that the school was about to be shut down anyway. What's there to lose?

Teachers are already underpaid in general. Are the people who wanted fair compensation for the extra time the district was asking from them dead weight? Now the district will hire replacements or the teachers who just need a paycheck for lower pay and the truly talented teachers will find work elsewhere.

No, they won't. Not sure about the market there, but the teacher job market here is oversaturated with certified teachers looking for work... Hence my worry about this dangerous precedent.

And those who think teachers are overpaid: it goes well beyond the classroom, all the shit they have to do.

The "fair compensation" the teachers were offered was $30/hour. The union defined "fair" as $90/hour, for teachers at a school where half the students are failing every subject. I wouldn't normally like this outcome due to its arbitrary nature, but the teachers decided to stand together and let their union negotiate for them. They can also stand together and accept the consequences of that decision.

They are underpaid and should be paid a bagillion dollars a year for the oh so fantastic job they were doing.

The new teachers (or some old teachers) that they hire on will see that they can be fired for sucking and will then do a better job in order to keep their job. That's how it works in the private sector, and that is how it shoudl work in the government sector.

I like this story. THen again I like any story where a union gets the shafting.

Have you ever heard somebody with a thick RI accent? No wonder kids can't learn shit there.

You mean like the kids were told to go play in the YAHd?