Two Wheel Fix

Two Wheel Fix (http://www.twowheelfix.com/index.php)
-   News Desk (http://www.twowheelfix.com/forumdisplay.php?f=97)
-   -   Congresswoman shot in Arizona (http://www.twowheelfix.com/showthread.php?t=17869)

udman 01-08-2011 01:49 PM

Congresswoman shot in Arizona
 
U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona was shot in the head outside a grocery store in Tucson while holding a public event, Arizona Public Media reported Saturday.

The Democrat, who was re-elected to her third term in November, was hosting a "Congress on Your Corner" event at the Safeway in northwest Tucson when a gunman ran up and started shooting, according to Peter Michaels, news director of Arizona Public Media.

At least nine other people, including members of her staff, were hurt. Giffords was transported to University Medical Center in Tucson. Her condition was not immediately known.

Giffords was talking to a couple when the suspect ran up firing indiscriminately and then ran off, Michaels said.

The suspect was tackled by a bystander and taken into custody. He was not injured.

Giffords was first elected to represent Arizona's 8th District in 2006. The "Congress on Your Corner" events allow constituents to present their concerns directly to her.

More details to come.

http://www.npr.org/2011/01/08/132764...medium=twitter

goof2 01-08-2011 01:56 PM

Just saw this as well. I'm curious to see what the shooter's issue was. No matter what it turns out to be the shooter should still fry.

udman 01-08-2011 02:16 PM

http://www.npr.org/2011/01/08/132764...hot-in-arizona

NPR now saying 7 are dead and that the shooter is a "late teen" or in early 20's...

udman 01-08-2011 02:22 PM

...and the message boards are already blaming Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle

Quote:

A K (Gumboz) wrote:

We don't know anything about the gunman or his motives. But we do know that Rep Giffords was one of the Democratic House members "targeted" with a "gun sight" on Sarah Palin's map. She said, "You know what to do." And now she'll say she's shocked -- SHOCKED -- that anybody would do such a thing.

Saturday, January 08, 2011 2:13:32 PM
Quote:

Robin McMullen (RobinMcM) wrote:

Is Congresswoman Giffords's death one of the "Second Amendment remedies" that Sharron Angle advocated?

Saturday, January 08, 2011 2:13:18 PM

goof2 01-08-2011 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by udman (Post 440377)
...and the message boards are already blaming Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle

I would have been surprised if they didn't, though that kind of speculation has been less than reliable in the past.

udman 01-08-2011 02:30 PM

Apparently Glenn Beck too...

Quote:

im2fools 02:23 PM

Hey, Glenn Beck. Fuck you.

Dave 01-08-2011 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by udman (Post 440377)
...and the message boards are already blaming Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle

it sickens me that this gal aint even cold yet before folks started trying to pull political value out of it. you should hear this douchbag david fitzsimmons comments on cnn.

pauldun170 01-08-2011 02:34 PM

someone may be taking something too seriously.

http://www.takebackthe20.com/
http://www.takebackthe20.com/candidates

udman 01-08-2011 02:40 PM

Hey ya'll should all stop hatin...unless you hate Republicans that is.
Quote:

Robert Bruce (popculturizm) wrote:

As of 5 minutes ago (2:30pm EST) the CongressWoman was reported to have been still alive. I believe that anyone making a hate comment on this board needs to take a long hard look in the mirror, The Left is not known for being Gun Owners or Carriers, and the Right (extremists like the Neo-Cons and T-Partiers) are known for this, with out the facts I would not be surprise if the perpetrator of this act would not be a "right-winger" who else who carry a "Semi-automatic" weapon. Having said that - prayers should be sent out to those who have lost their lives, their families and for the state of this country, simply a despicable act!!!

Saturday, January 08, 2011 2:37:03 PM

Avatard 01-08-2011 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 440383)
it sickens me that this gal aint even cold yet before folks started trying to pull political value out of it. you should hear this douchbag david fitzsimmons comments on cnn.

I haven't heard the story yet, and I haven't clicked on any links yet, BUT:

If another politico indeed called for this woman's death, I wouldn't characterize this as "people trying to put political value on it". It's already there.

If Palin did call for this woman's death, even if essentially only by suggestive graphic and the veiled suggestion of "you know what to do", then she should be clearly charged for complicity in any murders committed as a result of what could only be characterized as a rather blatant public incitement and inducement of murder.

I believe in free speech, but you can't yell fire in a theatre. Speech designed to cause death and harm to others is not protected. That's actually technically conspiracy/complicity to murder.

If this woman dies, Palin should be charged, if she indeed made these overt murder suggestions in a public forum.

I think it's fair to say that given her rather high public profile, she should be well aware that this type of incitement would likely lead to violence.

udman 01-08-2011 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440386)
I haven't heard the story yet, and I haven't clicked on any links yet, BUT:

If another politico indeed called for this woman's death, I wouldn't characterize this as "people trying to put political value on it". It's already there.

If Palin did call for this woman's death, even if essentially only by suggestive graphic and the veiled suggestion of "you know what to do", then she should be clearly charged for complicity in any murders committed as a result of what could only be characterized as a rather blatant public incitement and inducement of murder.

I believe in free speech, but you can't yell fire in a theatre. Speech designed to cause death and harm to others is not protected. That's actually technically conspiracy/complicity to murder.

If this woman dies, Palin should be charged, if she indeed made these overt murder suggestions in a public forum.

She wanted her voted out of office. Not Killed. But go ahead with the casting blame dumbass...

Avatard 01-08-2011 02:49 PM

Maybe you need to brush up on law, "dumbass".

Go use the word "bomb" in airport, asshole. See how far you get. Be sure to tell them you're only joking.

...But I'm the dumbass?

:lmao:

Douche.

pauldun170 01-08-2011 02:53 PM

If the reason is political and related to some website or message put out by Palin, its not because of Palin that this women is dead.
It would be because of the type of idiot people like Palin attract as followers.

However thats just speculation

udman 01-08-2011 02:54 PM

You're right. Arrest that man!!!

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/0...e-bring-a-gun/

Dumberasseser

Avatard 01-08-2011 02:55 PM

You don't yell fire in a theatre.

You don't say "bomb" at the airport.

If you're a politician, you don't even say the word assassination, let alone make jokes, or veiled suggestions about the assassinations of politicians.

It's EXACTLY the same thing, and it is NOT protected speech.

Dave 01-08-2011 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440386)
I haven't heard the story yet, and I haven't clicked on any links yet, BUT:

If another politico indeed called for this woman's death, I wouldn't characterize this as "people trying to put political value on it". It's already there.

If Palin did call for this woman's death, even if essentially only by suggestive graphic and the veiled suggestion of "you know what to do", then she should be clearly charged for complicity in any murders committed as a result of what could only be characterized as a rather blatant public incitement and inducement of murder.

I believe in free speech, but you can't yell fire in a theatre. Speech designed to cause death and harm to others is not protected. That's actually technically conspiracy/complicity to murder.

If this woman dies, Palin should be charged, if she indeed made these overt murder suggestions in a public forum.

I think it's fair to say that given her rather high public profile, she should be well aware that this type of incitement would likely lead to violence.

i was referring to the idiot political cartoonist they were interviewing on cnn who immediately blamed the right, america's "gun fetish", and said this was an inevitable event. try not to let your personal prejudices lead you into dumb statements

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170 (Post 440390)

However thats just speculation

Due to the low levels of carotene in desert climates, many Arizona democrats are mistaken for grizzly bears.

Palin + poor dietary habits = Murder.

JC

Avatard 01-08-2011 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by udman (Post 440392)
You're right. Arrest that man!!!

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/0...e-bring-a-gun/

Dumberasseser

Wow, you're fucking stretching, huh?

I suppose if someone got hurt in a melee that might have ensued, a case could be made that he was partially at fault...although you're reaching like a motherfucker here, and it would be laughed at in court.

This scenario, not so laughable.

Avatard 01-08-2011 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 440394)
i was referring to the idiot political cartoonist they were interviewing on cnn who immediately blamed the right, america's "gun fetish", and said this was an inevitable event. try not to let your personal prejudices lead you into dumb statements

Again, I have no knowledge of this other than what appears here.

I do know that if what was said here about what was supposedly posted on Palin's site is true, then that's incitement to murder, and not protected speech.

goof2 01-08-2011 03:04 PM

Maybe the shooter was motivated by Palin/Angle/Beck or maybe he wasn't. At this point guessing about the shooter's motives is nothing more than that, a guess. Don't forget when the Democratic Party headquarters in Colorado was vandalized. Democrats and the media immediately blamed Republicans who opposed healthcare reform for the act. As it turned out it had been carried out by a former Democratic canvasser apparently trying to make it look like a Republican. I am in no way saying that is what happened here, but trying to logically figure out the motivation for what is ultimately an illogical act can lead to the wrong conclusions.

The shooter is alive. I'm sure we will hear soon enough what motivated him.

goof2 01-08-2011 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440397)
This scenario, not so laughable.

Still pretty laughable.:shrug:

Avatard 01-08-2011 03:12 PM

Hmmm. One was a sports joke, no one got hurt.

This is a situation where people died.

Yeah, I suppose it's hilarious.

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 03:29 PM

At least we're still better than Pakistan...

JC

Avatard 01-08-2011 03:55 PM

Yeah, but the distinction is kinda fading, no?

pauldun170 01-08-2011 04:14 PM

Jared Lee LOUGHNER

"young, mid-to-late 20s (23), white, clean-shaven with short hair and wearing dark clothing."

http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10

tallywacker 01-08-2011 04:23 PM

Here is his youtube page

http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10

Dave 01-08-2011 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170 (Post 440420)
Jared Lee LOUGHNER

"young, mid-to-late 20s (23), white, clean-shaven with short hair and wearing dark clothing."

http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10

very republican sounding kid there :rolleyes:

Avatard 01-08-2011 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170 (Post 440420)
Jared Lee LOUGHNER

"young, mid-to-late 20s (23), white, clean-shaven with short hair and wearing dark clothing."

http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10

Yeah, I'm sure he was a shy, quiet kid, who kept mostly to himself...

tallywacker 01-08-2011 04:34 PM

Leftist the first to post a fake facebook page.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001935064664

Dave 01-08-2011 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallywacker (Post 440426)
Leftist the first to post a fake facebook page.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001935064664

lmao

Avatard 01-08-2011 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallywacker (Post 440426)
Leftist the first to post a fake facebook page.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001935064664

Needs "likes" for Sharron Angle.

goof2 01-08-2011 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440401)
Hmmm. One was a sports joke, no one got hurt.

This is a situation where people died.

Yeah, I suppose it's hilarious.

Your legal scenario is what I was referring to as laughable.:shrug:

Avatard 01-08-2011 04:47 PM

Yeah, funny guy, he shot a 9 year old, dead. It's hilarious, legally and otherwise.

Oh wait, no it isn't.

goof2 01-08-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440431)
Yeah, funny guy, he shot a 9 year old, dead. It's hilarious, legally and otherwise.

Oh wait, no it isn't.

Is that the legal scenario you posted? Sure doesn't sound like it.:shrug:

Particle Man 01-08-2011 05:06 PM

Holy fuck (about the original post and the turn it's taken)

Avatard 01-08-2011 05:07 PM

He used a fucking auto, or semi-auto too, right? That will no doubt be used by rabid anti-gun fanatics to further that agenda. Fucking great.

Kaneman 01-08-2011 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440437)
He used a fucking auto, or semi-auto too, right? That will no doubt be used by rabid anti-gun fanatics to further that agenda. Fucking great.

Believe it was a semi-automatic handgun....no different than a revolver really.

Trip 01-08-2011 05:09 PM

Anyone have a decent reference for what palin and angle did? I see the comments, but would rather see an accurate representation, because I am unaware of this story.

Was it just a map targeting elections they wanted or was there more?

Terrible about the original story. Hope it wasn't something as stupid as politics that caused this kid to do this.

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440437)
He used a fucking auto, or semi-auto too, right? That will no doubt be used by rabid anti-gun fanatics to further that agenda. Fucking great.


The gun that was shown on his facebook page was a semi-auto pistol.

JC

Avatard 01-08-2011 05:09 PM

Watch the buzzword "semi-automatic" be in nearly every headline starting in 3; 2; 1

Kaneman 01-08-2011 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440441)
Watch the buzzword "semi-automatic" be in nearly every headline starting in 3; 2; 1

No kids were killed, it won't happen this time.

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 440439)
Hope it wasn't something as stupid as politics that caused this kid to do this.

His youtube stuff seemed tea partyish to me.

"I hate my Community College teachers because they're illiterate and unconstitutional" and "I'm starting my own currency".

Sounds like the bats that flew out of Glen Becks mouth, found a belfry.

JC

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 440443)
No kids were killed, it won't happen this time.

A nine year old was killed, start hoarding bullets.

JC

Kaneman 01-08-2011 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440445)
A nine year old was killed, start hoarding bullets.

JC

Man I missed that part. Shit.

goof2 01-08-2011 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 440439)
Anyone have a decent reference for what palin and angle did? I see the comments, but would rather see an accurate representation, because I am unaware of this story.

Was it just a map targeting elections they wanted or was there more?

Terrible about the original story. Hope it wasn't something as stupid as politics that caused this kid to do this.

Palin had a map with important House seats marked on it using bullseyes. I believe Giffords' seat was one marked on the map.

Sharon Angle said the following on the radio "Our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason, and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government." and also "In fact, Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies."

goof2 01-08-2011 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440444)
His youtube stuff seemed tea partyish to me.

"I hate my Community College teachers because they're illiterate and unconstitutional" and "I'm starting my own currency".

Sounds like the bats that flew out of Glen Becks mouth, found a belfry.

JC

"I went to MEPS and was given a bible even though I told my recruiter I'm an atheist and he put NONE for my religion" sounds kind of leftist though. Either way the brainwashing and mind control aren't integral to either party's platform that I've seen. With the little out so far I'd guess his political affiliation is the insanity party.

tallywacker 01-08-2011 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2 (Post 440450)
"I went to MEPS and was given a bible even though I told my recruiter I'm an atheist and he put NONE for my religion" sounds kind of leftist though. Either way the brainwashing and mind control aren't integral to either party's platform that I've seen. With the little out so far I'd guess his political affiliation is the insanity party.

Yeah the guy is just a nutjob.

Hydrant 01-08-2011 05:31 PM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...sarahpac_0.jpg


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_511433.html

tallywacker 01-08-2011 05:31 PM

Naaah she most likely just the Anti-Christ and she will rise to world domination after this.

tallywacker 01-08-2011 05:34 PM

http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townn...02e0.image.jpg
Quote:

Jackie Storrer, right, tries her best to figure out the clues on a giant crossword as Jared Loughner, a volunteer, stands in the background during the Tucson Festival of Books
There he is

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2 (Post 440450)
Either way the brainwashing and mind control aren't integral to either party's platform that I've seen. With the little out so far I'd guess his political affiliation is the insanity party.

Then again...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,535927,00.html

JC

tallywacker 01-08-2011 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440456)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82VIy44tDH8

She was anti-immigration. These people don't seem too happy about that.

Trip 01-08-2011 05:39 PM

That's the map, sorry I see no issue with that. There needs to be more to it than that for me to be upset about it. I don't believe in safety nazi sanitizing the world for nutjobs. Nutjobs will go nuts no matter what we do. He would of found another group to make him feel "a part of something" and went nutz on the con side of that.

goof2 01-08-2011 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440456)

Do you see the difference between what I said and discussing a bill that never made it out of committee?

goof2 01-08-2011 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 440458)
That's the map, sorry I see no issue with that. There needs to be more to it than that for me to be upset about it. I don't believe in safety nazi sanitizing the world for nutjobs. Nutjobs will go nuts no matter what we do. He would of found another group to make him feel "a part of something" and went nutz on the con side of that.

But didn't you hear, that map is as good as Palin pulling the trigger herself.:skep:

tallywacker 01-08-2011 05:47 PM

lol...a Arizona Congressman on CNN just said there is blood on Sarah Palin's hands. Lefty's are manning the political battle-stations.

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallywacker (Post 440457)

She was anti-immigration. These people don't seem too happy about that.

She was anti unprotected borders.

Not the same thing.

JC

tallywacker 01-08-2011 05:52 PM

Quote:

=|
If there's no flag in the constitution then the flag in the film is unknown.
There's no flag in the constitution.
Therefore, the flag in the film is unknown.
Burn every new and old flag that you see.
Burn your flag!
I bet you can imagine this in your mind with a faster speed.
Watch this protest in reverse!
Ask the local police; "What's your illegal activity on duty?".
If you protest the government then there's a new government from protesting.
There's not a new government from protesting.
Thus, you aren't protesting the government.
There's something important in this video: There's no communication to anyone in this location.
You shouldn't be afraid of the stars.
There's a new bird on my right shoulder. The beak is two feet and lime green. The rarest bird on earth, there's no feathers, but small grey scales all over the body. It's with one large red eye with a light blue iris. The bird feet are the same as a woodpecker. This new bird and there's only one, the gender is not female or male. The wings of this bird are beautiful; 3 feet wide with the shape of a bald eagle that you could die for. If you can see this bird then you will understand. You think this bird is able to chat about a government?
I want you to imagine a comet or meteoroid coming through the atmosphere.
On the other hand, welcome yourself to the desert: Maybe your ability to protest is from the brainwash of the current government structure.
Sounds sane

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440465)
She was anti unprotected borders.

Not the same thing.

JC

Well of course not

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2 (Post 440459)
Do you see the difference between what I said and discussing a bill that never made it out of committee?

What I know so far is this:

A. The guy is some form of crazy.

B. He shot a bunch of Democrats, for as yet unknown reasons.

You think he just happened to be driving by the Safeway, and decided to shoot up the parking lot on a bipartisan basis?

I don't think so. The boy had an agenda of some sort.

JC

Dave 01-08-2011 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallywacker (Post 440463)
lol...a Arizona Congressman on CNN just said there is blood on Sarah Palin's hands. Lefty's are manning the political battle-stations.

Aaand with any luck rational people will see this a know how pathetically little they value their own colleague's life and which group of folks has really been breeding hate here. Aw hell who am I kidding? This is the land of the retards.

Did she have no security detail present? All reports say she was shot from "point blank range" and if true the lack/utter failure of security ought to negate the fact that a gun was used

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440469)
What I know so far is this:

A. The guy is some form of crazy.

B. He shot a bunch of Democrats, for as yet unknown reasons.

You think he just happened to be driving by the Safeway, and decided to shoot up the parking lot on a bipartisan basis?

I don't think so. The boy had an agenda of some sort.

JC

From what I read of him his agenda seems to be against what was convieniantly available

Avatard 01-08-2011 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 440458)
That's the map, sorry I see no issue with that. There needs to be more to it than that for me to be upset about it. I don't believe in safety nazi sanitizing the world for nutjobs. Nutjobs will go nuts no matter what we do. He would of found another group to make him feel "a part of something" and went nutz on the con side of that.

No, you're right. Nuts will be nuts.

But Politicians should never say anything, or even suggest anything in regards to killing, or assassination, in regards to themselves or others in public. It's just not done. Just like saying "bomb" at the airport. You just don't do that, and adults generally know better.

She has always used incendiary militant language, and that kind of thing feeds freaks. She should know better, but she's profoundly fucking stupid, that bitch.

tallywacker 01-08-2011 06:34 PM

Read this link...

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...-blogging.html


A former friend of Loughner's has a Twitter feed.

Quote:

I haven't seen him since '07. Then, he was left wing.

As I knew him he was left wing, quite liberal. & oddly obsessed with the 2012 prophecy.

he was a pot head & into rock like Hendrix,The Doors, Anti-Flag.

Avatard 01-08-2011 06:35 PM

http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...041408,00.html

Avatard 01-08-2011 06:38 PM

"Various Palin sites are frantically removing various incendiary materials - which is both gratifying, but also, it seems to me, an acknowledgment of previous rhetorical excess. TakeBackThe20.com is in meltdown, images like these are being removed ASAP, and Palin's Facebook page simply cannot cope with the number of commenters blasting her."

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...47e162ddb4970b

tallywacker 01-08-2011 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440482)

Wasn't this already posted? It's from june and many people are taking it way out of context.

Avatard 01-08-2011 06:40 PM

Well, Palin's political career is dead.

tallywacker 01-08-2011 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440485)
Well, Palin's political career is dead.

Hopefully

Avatard 01-08-2011 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallywacker (Post 440484)
Wasn't this already posted? It's from june and many people are taking it way out of context.

Again, I haven't read too much here. I was quoting what I found relevant from the article you just posted above.

tallywacker 01-08-2011 06:52 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnNx0WThoF0

This doesn't sound right-wing to me

Trip 01-08-2011 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440477)
No, you're right. Nuts will be nuts.

But Politicians should never say anything, or even suggest anything in regards to killing, or assassination, in regards to themselves or others in public. It's just not done. Just like saying "bomb" at the airport. You just don't do that, and adults generally know better.

She has always used incendiary militant language, and that kind of thing feeds freaks. She should know better, but she's profoundly fucking stupid, that bitch.

Politicians have the same right as us and what her staff did with that map is hardly anything to blame an actual attack on her for. This is the pussification of America and you are being the prime example of it. They shouldn't be held accountable for nutjobs. Her little map with target points doesn't mean go kill people and any sane person understands this. Just as selling Grand Theft Auto to kids doesn't mean they should go murder hookers after having sex with them and running people over with cars just for the fun of it. OMG they made battleground references, this is just terrible. People are going to start a war because Ohio is a battleground state.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440482)
"Various Palin sites are frantically removing various incendiary materials - which is both gratifying, but also, it seems to me, an acknowledgment of previous rhetorical excess. TakeBackThe20.com is in meltdown, images like these are being removed ASAP, and Palin's Facebook page simply cannot cope with the number of commenters blasting her."

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...47e162ddb4970b

Well yeah, a nutjob went fucking nuts. They are being respectful of the deaths. Me and a friend made a joke website before 9/11 making fun of islamic terrorists. It was about Civil Unrest National Terrorists and the leader was Saddam Eyesmee. I didn't support the nutjobs that did 9/11, but I took down that website in respect to the people that died.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440485)
Well, Palin's political career is dead.

We can only hope. No way she would of won president anyway. I don't think she would of even got the repub nomination.

Avatard 01-08-2011 06:58 PM

Yeah, but at least the stupid bitch will disappear now
 
I'd bet TLC is cancelling her show as we speak.

Particle Man 01-08-2011 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440441)
Watch the buzzword "semi-automatic" be in nearly every headline starting in 3; 2; 1

They're probably mad that they can't use "high powered rifle" so "semi-automatic" will have to do.

The media LOVES that one more then semi-auto.

goof2 01-08-2011 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus (Post 440469)
What I know so far is this:

A. The guy is some form of crazy.

B. He shot a bunch of Democrats, for as yet unknown reasons.

You think he just happened to be driving by the Safeway, and decided to shoot up the parking lot on a bipartisan basis?

I don't think so. The boy had an agenda of some sort.

JC

I agree that he had a reason of some sort that made sense to him. That doesn't mean it was political and I'm guessing it isn't going to be anything resembling rational either. If you read back on my posts I haven't made any claim or suggestion about what those reasons may be.

Could he be a right wing tea partying lunatic who did this out of a wildly misguided sense of patriotism? Sure. Could he have done this because the government is responsible for making his bananas too yellow? Sure. At this point it is pure speculation. The guy is alive and his reasons will most likely come out. One thing I will claim is that when they do they still won't make any sense because this is ultimately a senseless act.

Back to what we were discussing. I was asking if you saw the difference between this guy thinking the government was brainwashing people and controlling their minds and what you posted, discussion of potential ramifications of a bill that never made it out of committee.

goof2 01-08-2011 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440497)
I'd bet TLC is cancelling her show as we speak.

I didn't read any of the stories but CNN, MSN, and a few other websites have had headlines for the last couple days indicating the show wasn't coming back next year.:shrug:

derf 01-08-2011 07:17 PM

Palin's show was cancelled, or at least not renewed for season 2. The explination given has nothing to do with the shooting

http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b219...own_after.html

goof2 01-08-2011 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Particle Man (Post 440498)
They're probably mad that they can't use "high powered rifle" so "semi-automatic" will have to do.

The media LOVES that one more then semi-auto.

I get the feeling they love "semi-automatic" more since it allows them to occasionally forget the "semi" and label it an "automatic handgun".

Avatard 01-08-2011 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2 (Post 440507)
I didn't read any of the stories but CNN, MSN, and a few other websites have had headlines for the last couple days indicating the show wasn't coming back next year.:shrug:

Well, I'd say her political career is now also officially canceled then.

Trip 01-08-2011 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440510)
Well, I'd say her political career is now also officially canceled then.

Did you actually believe she had a shot? I know she was delusional enough to think that, but did you honestly believe she had a shot before this?

Avatard 01-08-2011 07:22 PM

I don't know if she really had a shot [insert tasteless joke here], but I'm about as sick of that cunt as I am sick of the fucking Kardashians, and Justin Beiber.

goof2 01-08-2011 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440510)
Well, I'd say her political career is now also officially canceled then.

I doubt this will have much of an effect on Palin's political career unless the shooter gives "I did it for Sarah!" as his reason. I also didn't think she had a shot at winning the Republican nomination before this either though.

Trip 01-08-2011 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440515)
I don't know if she really had a shot [insert tasteless joke here], but I'm about as sick of that cunt as I am sick of the fucking Kardashians, and Justin Beiber.

Honestly I think for the Democrats, they should want her in the election. The republicans are just as tired of that bitch and the right leaning moderates won't vote for that bitch. They would go Obama in a big way. He would coast to victory easily against Palin.

I would vote Obama over Palin.

Avatard 01-08-2011 07:38 PM

I hear ya, and if I was really partisan, I'd probably be pulling for her, for just that reason. I'd rather see someone with a real chance run, but who is even remotely legit on the other team?

goof2 01-08-2011 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 440474)
Did she have no security detail present? All reports say she was shot from "point blank range" and if true the lack/utter failure of security ought to negate the fact that a gun was used

From what I understand most members of the House don't travel home with security unless their is a credible threat against them. The Capitol Police, who provide security for them, said they were aware of no threats against Giffords otherwise they would have sent security with her.

Trip 01-08-2011 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440525)
I hear ya, and if I was really partisan, I'd probably be pulling for her, for just that reason. I'd rather see someone with a real chance run, but who is even remotely legit on the other team?

Honestly, there is no one I would vote for, I am tired of everyone that has the slightest shot.

Uh oh, Avy. The media is going to run with this one too.

Quote:

His exact motivation was not clear, but a former classmate described Loughner as a pot-smoking loner who had rambling beliefs about the world.
Had to throw the pot-smoking in there, sure that's going to take a beating in the media too.

So basically pot smoking and guns are going to be attacked for the next few months.

Avatard 01-08-2011 07:48 PM

Pretty much.

askmrjesus 01-08-2011 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2 (Post 440506)

Back to what we were discussing. I was asking if you saw the difference between this guy thinking the government was brainwashing people and controlling their minds and what you posted, discussion of potential ramifications of a bill that never made it out of committee.

I see it.

But then, I'm not (that) crazy.

It all boils down to tone and inflection. I saw nothing in the bill that amounted to what I would consider active mind control. If, however, you are pre-disposed to being the poster boy for the "Homicidal White Loner Asshole Society", the shineola Beck's spitting out, could easily be construed as an affirmation of your paranoid delusions.

Beck is a fear monger. "The country is being destroyed, everyone is a Socialist, the Illuminati are coming, and we're all going to hell. Here, buy some Gold."

The man is a televised catalyst of evil.

JC

Trip 01-09-2011 12:12 AM

The more I hear about this, the more I see this spawning another patriot act. I hope we don't lose more freedoms cause of this dumbass.

Avatard 01-09-2011 12:30 AM

Of course we will. Shit like this causes fear. Fear is used as a tool by those who wish to control us, and they won't miss the opportunity to parlay this into some fucked up new legislation that makes us somehow less free.

This is pretty much a given, I'm afraid...

quackPOT 01-09-2011 12:58 AM

For the people foaming at the mouth over Palin's use of targets, please make sure you give equal foamage towards the Dems too... The Democratic Leadership Council did the same shit back in 2004.

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?conte...=127&subid=171

http://www.dlc.org/upload_graphics/B...heartland1.gif

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has done it too, over a year ago...

http://www.verumserum.com/media/2010...target-map.jpg

"Targeted Republicans"

http://www.verumserum.com/media/2010...republican.jpg

It's funny and pathetic how many people are laying so much blame on both groups and individuals because of a SINGLE NUTJOB. This isn't about left or right, guns, or Sarah Palin, it's about some fucktard who went off the deep end. Get a grip people.

Avatard 01-09-2011 01:02 AM

Target =/= Gunsight.

You throw darts at a bulls-eye.

A scope is found on a gun.

Trip 01-09-2011 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440639)
Target =/= Gunsight.

You throw darts at a bulls-eye.

A scope is found on a gun.

They do make the same theme of using combative/war like language. I mean "Behind Enemy Lines." They were clearly making it seem like they were trying to get the exact same point across.

I have shot bullets and arrows at a bullseye. I have never thrown "darts." The bullseye looks nothing like a true dartboard. You are really reaching to try to pawn this one off instead of just admitting the obvious. Palin is not guilty of forcing anyone sane to pursue this method.

Trip 01-09-2011 01:09 AM

http://nancysneedlecrafts.com/sports...rt%20Board.jpg

=/=

http://yesyesss.files.wordpress.com/.../dartboard.gif

Trip 01-09-2011 01:11 AM

http://fototime.com/ECECC40B722C67B/standard.jpg

Avatard 01-09-2011 01:14 AM

Yep, you're right; the Democratic one looks like an archery target.

Palin's is unmistakably a gun scope.

I imagine that if the Democrats used inflammatory language also (like "RELOAD!"), they might have incited someone to nefarious "archery".

Or not.

Trip 01-09-2011 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440650)
Yep, you're right; the Democratic one looks like an archery target.

Palin's is unmistakably a gun scope.

The first one looks a lot like this too.

I have shot numerous times at a similar target at my local gun range with similar colors.

http://image.shutterstock.com/displa...e-22884709.jpg

Avatard 01-09-2011 01:23 AM

Are you familiar with the term disambiguation?

Palin's targets are not in any way ambiguous. The others are, you proved it here.

Just saying.

Trip 01-09-2011 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440653)
Are you familiar with the term disambiguation?

Palin's targets are not in any way ambiguous. The others are, you proved it here.

Just saying.

Just saying you are trying in every way possible to deflect any criticism of democrats. Why? You are supposedly Libertarian. Why do you try everything you can to make things acceptable for them and not for republicans? Sorry when I see a bullseye and see the word target, I take it as that's something you are going to aim to destroy, that same as I would a gun sight target.

If you are for neither party, just say, yep they pulled the same shit and move on with your day. Why is it so important to defend them?

I see no issue with either party using it, BTW. Just like Kellen Winslow saying he was a "fuckin soldier" after getting beat by UT in a football game. Did he mean he was a fuckin soldier killing enemy soldiers? fuck no.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I82BPA5QAaQ

tallywacker 01-09-2011 01:34 AM

I think palin is a complete moron, but I also to think you're a moron if you think palin influenced this in anyway.

This guy was just insane.

Avatard 01-09-2011 01:47 AM

Freakshow was a leftist:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40980334...me_and_courts/

See bottom of article.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallywacker (Post 440663)
I think palin is a complete moron, but I also to think you're a moron if you think palin influenced this in anyway.

This guy was just insane.

Wasn't drawing conclusions, just stating facts. I'm reading this shit as it comes in, same as all of you.

Trip 01-09-2011 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard (Post 440667)
Freakshow was a leftist:

Wasn't drawing conclusions, just stating facts. I'm reading this shit as it comes in, same as all of you.

So basically all of this thread is moot now. I wonder how the major networks are going to respond to this now that they know this had nothing to do with Palin's stupid map.

Shit happens, that's why I don't care about either party's target maps. They can't be held responsible for insane individuals. A sane person knows those maps don't actually mean target to kill.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.