![]() |
Tire balancing
How picky or sensitive are you to tire balancing?
|
My tire installer does not balance my tires, the same weight stays on it, and thus far I nor any of the other guys I ride with have had issues. So no I'm not picky about it.
|
Not picky and I do most of my own tire changes.
Tom |
Picky enough that even when I let someone else mount them, I usually balance them myself.
|
dyna beads FTW
|
decently picky... not gonna kill 20+ min getting it perfect though. but I take my time.
with the knobbies... I'll get them close... but if it takes longer than 2 maybe 3 min... I'm done. can't really feel it with the knobbs anyhow |
I had a guy that could balance the tire with no weight, just by mounting it. Worked on every tire, every time. He's throw it on the balancer to prove it.
|
You should be able to. WIth proper alignment to the valve stem
|
I pay to have it done. It's cheap enough.
|
Quote:
If a bike see's 100+ then it needs proper balancing (IMHO) and I'm not chancing that |
Quote:
|
Quote:
the only time mine wouldn't balance right off the changer was when my wheels had started to egg. Got new wheels, problem solved. |
Quote:
Most street tires come "pre-balanced", in that there will be a small blue or yellow dot, usually on or next to the bead, that indicates the lightest part of the tire. This mark is 180 degrees from where the cords or belts overlap, which would be the heaviest part of the tire. Theoretically, this mark is installed at the valve stem, which is the heaviest part of the rim. This is not, however, not completely accurate. It's just a starting point. By rotating the tire on the rim, you can decrease the amount of weight needed, sometimes all the way to zero. Most shops will not do this, because it is extremely time consuming. You have to keep moving the tire/rim back and forth between the changing machine and the balancer, and adjust the dot placement as you go, about an inch at a time. Huge PITA. Even if the mark is installed at the valve stem, you can still be off as much as 2-3 oz., and that's a lot of weights. I will usually try to get a tire down to .75 oz, or less, before I stop fucking with it. Troy is right, it's best to get your tires balanced as close to perfect as you can, especially if your going to run at triple digits. Find a shop that has a computerized dynamic balancer if possible. These machines will not only balance the tire "top-to-bottom" but also side to side. You're not going to get it any better than that. Oh, my answer is very picky, if you haven't already guessed. :lol: JC |
I've never had an issue with one being out of balance or at least I've never noticed any of my tires being out. If I noticed it I would want it corrected but again...never had an issue with any tire change. :idk:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I hear ya. I'm just saying it SHOULD be able to be done.
Don't matter to me. I run beads and therefor it only costs me about $6 a wheel and they are balenced better than stick/clamp on weights. IMO |
I still can't understand how a bunch of free floating weight in your tire would balance it.
If that's the case, water in the tires would have the same effect and be cheaper. |
I don't typically care whether its balanced or not... I can handle some vibrations... its not going to make me go down lol.
|
Quote:
BUt I have put them in countless bikes. They work. |
There's no need to read up on it.
They're not magic beads. They can't search out a spot in your tire that needs weight. If anything they will spread out evenly throughout the tire and make it the exact same as before. Centrifugal force dictates this. If you think they work for you, peace of mind is all that matters. But, scientifically speaking, they don't make any sense. Your heaviest spot on your tire will be thrown out the hardest by the forces being applied. The beads, if anything, would go to that spot and amplify the effect. |
Quote:
How do you know they're working? Is it just by "feel"? Also, this blurb from their website makes no sense to me: Can I put the tire on a balancer to see if it's working? No. Dyna Beads operates on physics principles, and requires the tire assembly to be in motion against a road surface to detect the exact counterbalance position. An electronic balancer has a solid, fixed mount, and does not allow the tire to react to imbalance. Ok. I balanced and installed more tires than I can count, back when I owned a shop. Ballpark- maybe close to 1000. I don't claim to be an expert on all things tire, but the highlighted statement is completely false. Obviously electronic balancers allow the tire to react to imbalance, since, well, that's what they fucking do. I'm not saying they don't work, because frankly, I don't know. But it bothers me that there is no apparent way to test them, or compare them to traditional balancing, other than the "seat of the pants" method. JC |
I did do a bit of reading ala google. And mcn reviewed em, said they didn't do anything.
Some ppl say they cause severe imbalance at high speeds. Then I happen upon an idea that put it to rest for me. How come the only proof they have is a water bottle and a drill? Where is the documentation? The racers who use them? The scientific documentation? Of the several threads I've read on different forums they all say the same, "they make no sense". And then somebody posted a dynabeads FAQ which stated they would not work on "race" tires because the rubber is too soft. :lol |
Amj, there are ways to show they work. They just don't seem to want to prove it.
Do a video of an unbalanced tire, throw the beads in and show the video of that. Problem solved. |
Quote:
Centrifugal force doesn't come and go depending on whether or not the tire is touching a road surface. I also don't see how the beads would have any effect at all, on lateral balance, since centrifugal force would dictate that the beads would seek the center of the tire only. JC |
I've never even head of these Dyna beads. Doesn't sound like anything I want.
Quote:
Quote:
|
I don't know guys. All I can tell you is that I have been runing them in 4 of my own bikes. Removed 1-2 oz from each tire that I put beads in. Works great!
Put them in a few choppers that had 100mph wobbles. Beads in... no more wobble. I have probably installed these in 2 dozen bikes myself. EVERY SINGLE ONE has had great results. For what its worth, Drewpy was also running them in the RC as well. |
Quote:
When rocking through the twisties.. it makes no difference. Hard on the gas.. hard on the brakes... pucks on the ground... its all stable. |
I always line up the heavy point of the wheel with the light mark on the tire and rarely need much, if any weight. In my experience the valve stem is almost never the heavy point of a cast wheel.
|
Quote:
I've never really looked into why it works but it does seem to. |
If you're adding a bunch of weight, I can see it acting as a damper.... That's the only logical reason I can come I with.
|
Quote:
|
I dont think these are the same brand that we use but it's the same idea.
http://www.centramatic.com/Page.aspx?page=Demo By doing something like this you're also balancing the entire hub/drum/wheel assembly. Not just the wheel. |
Has anyone else notice that dunlops seem to take a crap load of weight to be balance. I have never like dunlops but the few times I have ran them they take a lot to balance.
|
Not sure about motorcycles, but cars have something they call "road force balancing".
I personally just use a dial indicator to get the lowest runout I can. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.