|
04-18-2008, 12:23 AM | #1 |
noodles... dont noodles..
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 427
|
New AMA Class structure
no supersport
no superstock superbike becomes 'liter bikes' Daytona Superbike is.... read on- http://superbikeplanet.com/2008/Apr/080417a.htm
__________________
Theres no sense crying over every mistake, you just keep on trying till you run out of cake. |
04-18-2008, 09:23 AM | #2 | ||
Hold mah beer!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 80 Miles South of Moto Heaven
Moto: 08 R1200GS
Posts: 23,268
|
New Class Structure
WTF are they thinking getting rid of the 600 superstock and supersport. I loved those classes....
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/2008/Apr/080417a.htm Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
04-18-2008, 10:02 AM | #3 |
At Large
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jax, FL
Moto: 2005 R1
Posts: 678
|
Hmmm. It sounds interesting. I'll have to wait and see how it turns out. I like the fact it seems they want to attract new manafactures to the Daytona Superbikes class.
However, I have a feeling that this reallignment will end up pissing off some manafactures as well.
__________________
MSF Rider Coach Motorcycle Training Institue Inc "Riding a motorcycle is like playing chess. Anyone can learn the moves, but it takes a lifetime to master the game." |
04-18-2008, 12:05 PM | #4 |
Contagious Track Addict
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vegas
Moto: Too many bikes
Posts: 131
|
I think it's a big mistake to get rid of the 600cc class. I was also hoping for a 450 singles class.
Since the "Daytona Superbike" class is based on horsepower and weight, rather than engine size, I wonder if manufacturers like Norton with their rotary engine might return?
__________________
WERA #8 Dainese, Las Vegas Dyno Tech, Inhouse Suspension, Kal Gard, Moto Cafe, Vortex, GM Signs, Trackday.net, 702sportbikes |
04-18-2008, 12:06 PM | #5 | |
Ride Like an Asshole
Join Date: Feb 2008
Moto: nothing...
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Why would they? Wouldn't the limitations on HP and weight ratios defeat the whole purpose of the rotary engine? |
|
04-18-2008, 12:22 PM | #6 |
Contagious Track Addict
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vegas
Moto: Too many bikes
Posts: 131
|
How would that defeat the purpose? Norton left the sport because of the "cc" regulations. If their only restrictions are HP and weight, they could come up with an engine with the right hp that probably weighed less than most of the bikes, so they'd have to add ballast to it.
__________________
WERA #8 Dainese, Las Vegas Dyno Tech, Inhouse Suspension, Kal Gard, Moto Cafe, Vortex, GM Signs, Trackday.net, 702sportbikes |
04-18-2008, 04:51 PM | #7 |
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
Take a peek at the supersport times and tell me that they aren't the best AMA class? Most competitive, most entertaining, and now history
Superstock had run it's course and was really just a GSXR Cup so I can see it going bye bye. Plus side Liter bike rules will require each manufacturer to enter at least 4 riders so Josh Hayes gets his dream ride! Wonder who will be the spec tire? Dunlop...Ptewiiie
__________________
Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
Bookmarks |
|
|