![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
![]()
Round headlights FTW
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
![]()
Back on topic here...CBR250 has a single cyl and weighs 366 lbs. Ninja 250 has a parallel twin and weighs 372 lbs. The deliver of the two engines couldnt be more different. And any comparison to the incoming Moto3 class is ridiculous as their single has a min weight of 62 WITH rider...
I am certain in a close tight course either is fun and amusing but the Ninja has a greater rpm limit which in my head means it would be the best adapted to different tracks or street riding.
__________________
![]() Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Chaotic Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
TWF Post whore #6 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Custom User Title
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
![]()
__________________
I'm not "fat." I'm "Enlarged to show texture." Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|