![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
![]()
I find it hilarious that you're all looking to me as some fucking oracle of wisdom on this, when I've already said, I don't know how many times already in this thread, that I know shit about Cali politics.
I just suggested it's a bit more complicated than that "it's all the liberals fault!" alarm 101 keeps fucking abusing. When it was suggested that "Podunk didn't get special consideration, why should Cali?" I tried to point out that Cali has a shit ton of important industries that didn't get a bailout, and that this may further complicate the matter. I don't really believe that the other states don't matter, but I don't believe that Cali should be treated the same as Podunk for all the reasons I stated. WTF is so hard for you people to grasp?
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | ||
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
We get it...you don't.
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
![]()
The current Republican track record doesn't suggest they'd be any thriftier. If they were in charge of CA, they'd probably blow a ton of money subsidizing defense and energy companies and kissing their ass. Plus they are all bark and no bite when it comes to the immigration problem. They're too busy protecting the industries that use that cheap labor.
Last edited by Homeslice; 12-13-2010 at 09:21 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
Let's do another U-turn
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Moto: 2009 V-Strom
Posts: 3,816
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
![]() Quote:
So what we have is two groups. One spends our money on social programs...for us. Another diverts our money to the rich. Both spend. Why not have the ones that at least spend our money on US? I fail to see what attracts anyone to the republican position who isn't a millionaire or billionaire.
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 | |
Nomadic Tribesman
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
|
![]() Quote:
Not only was it not withdrawn, but it was "improved" over that time. Any Republican who points to the Carter years as the origin of the problem, must also wear the problem, himself, for the 5 sessions during that time that the Republicans had both The House and The Senate. A ticking time-bomb, but no one fixed it?
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising" http://www.morallyambiguous.net/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 | |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
![]() Quote:
Who's to say that with a meal to feed their family, the poor won't steal from you less...would this not also benefit YOU?
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 | |
Virtual Machine
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Moto: 2010 Ducati Hypermotard
Posts: 1,698
|
![]() Quote:
That's all I hear. Fucking bums wanting a free ride.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 | |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
![]() Quote:
So, I ask you...if the Democrats to you equal only "share the wealth", and having that happen can only help raise life standards and education for all (thus you indirectly), why would you prefer the Republican alternative, which is ultimately to just make a tiny few millionaires (the richest 1%) and billionaires even richer? If Democrats only suggest "share the wealth" to you, then this at least keeps the overall distribution of wealth more equitable, and guarantees greater overall prosperity, peace, and quality of life. Why would you not prefer this?
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|