Obama names Kagan as Supreme Court nominee

[pauldun170]

Obama names Kagan as Supreme Court nominee
By the CNN Wire Staff
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: Obama names solicitor general to replace retiring Justice Stevens
Kagan received her law degree from Harvard, she later served as dean of the law school
Kagan has argued several high-profile cases before the Supreme Court
Conservative critics say she is too inexperienced to serve on the high court
Wolf Blitzer will have the latest on President Obama's Supreme Court nominee as well as a full analysis of what she will bring to the court. Watch "The Situation Room" today at 5 p.m. ET on CNN.

Washington (CNN) -- President Obama named Solicitor General Elena Kagan on Monday as his nominee to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court.

CNN is covering the announcement live online, on television and on the iPhone.

Kagan, 50, a New York native, has been widely reported to be the front-runner for the nomination. She was a finalist for the high court vacancy last year when Justice Sonia Sotomayor was selected to replace the retiring David Souter.

If confirmed, Kagan would be the third woman on the nine-justice bench and the fourth in the history of the court. Her confirmation also would mean that the Supreme Court would have no Protestant justices for the first time in its history. Kagan, who is Jewish, would join six Catholic and two Jewish justices; Stevens is Protestant.

Kagan received her law degree from Harvard University, where she later served as dean of the law school. She previously served in the Clinton administration as associate White House counsel.

Obama decided on Kagan as his nominee on Sunday and called her around 8 p.m., a source close to the process said.

He did not have to look far when considering Kagan. As solicitor general, she is the administration's top lawyer before the Supreme Court and has argued several high-profile cases before the justices since taking the job in spring 2009.

"You have to admit, Elena Kagan is a brilliant woman," Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said during a radio interview a year ago when Kagan was being vetted for a high court seat. "She is a brilliant lawyer. If [Obama] picks her, it is a real dilemma for people," especially conservatives.

"And she will undoubtedly say that she will abide by the rule of law."

Her confirmation hearings for the solicitor general job could offer a preview of what she can expect from both Democrats and Republicans. Many saw it as a dress rehearsal of sorts for a high court job.

GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham told Kagan she presented a "positive impression." Democrats were similarly enthused.

With that endorsement, she won confirmation for her current job by a 61-31 vote.

A number of conservative groups were less enamored.

"Among Supreme Court nominees over the last 50 years or more, Kagan may well be the nominee with the least amount of relevant experience," said Ed Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, former law clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia, and former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Kagan had never argued a case before the Supreme Court or any appeals court before she became solicitor general about a year ago.

"Solicitor General Kagan has been nominated with no judicial experience, a mere two years of private law practice, and only a year as solicitor general of the United States," said David McIntosh, co-founder of the Federalist Society -- a conservative and libertarian legal group -- and former congressman from Indiana. "She is one of the most inexperienced nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court in recent memory."

Kagan's position on gays in the military is virtually certain to generate controversy during her confirmation hearings. She has been strongly criticized by conservatives for her efforts to block military recruiters from Harvard because of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The policy, first enacted during the Clinton administration but opposed by Obama, prohibits homosexuals from serving openly in the armed forces.

While serving as dean at Harvard Law, Kagan said she "abhorred" the military's "discriminatory recruitment policy." She called it "a profound wrong -- a moral injustice of the first order."

Kagan supported other schools challenging a federal law requiring them to give recruiters equal access or face the loss of federal funding. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law in 2006.

Some liberal organizations, on the other hand, have expressed concern over Kagan's views on executive power. As chief defender of the administration's anti-terrorism strategy, Kagan has articulated a more robust defense of the White House than many civil rights and human rights groups would like.

Observers on both sides of the political aisle have noted that Kagan has a relatively short paper trail compared to other recent Supreme Court nominees.

Kagan grew up in a Jewish household on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. She went to Princeton University and Harvard Law School. She served as a law clerk for federal judge Abner Mikva and then for Justice Thurgood Marshall on the high court.

In her 1986 job application to Marshall, she matter-of-factly told the civil rights pioneer, "I would be honored to serve as your clerk." The nation's first African-American justice affectionately called the diminutive Kagan "Shorty."

Kagan later went into teaching, starting at the University of Chicago, where one of the part-time faculty was Obama. Also teaching at the time was Diane Wood, who later became a federal judge and also was a finalist for the current high court vacancy. Kagan and Wood were among the few women on the full-time faculty at that time.

President Clinton later named Kagan associate White House counsel and then appointed her to the influential Domestic Policy Council, where she earned a reputation for articulate and well-reasoned statements on tricky political issues. She was the administration's point person on passing anti-tobacco legislation, negotiating in 1998 with Republican Sen. John McCain to give the federal government the authority to control cigarettes, as it does pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

Clinton picked her in 1999 for the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. But no Senate confirmation hearings were held, and the nomination lapsed. The seat was later filled by John Roberts, who quickly used the appointment as a springboard to chief justice.

Named Harvard's dean in 2003, Kagan earned a reputation for soothing longstanding tensions over a perceived liberal tilt to the faculty and curriculum.

She began pushing for the appointment of conservative professors, including Jack Goldsmith, who had been a lawyer in President George W. Bush's Justice Department. Such hires eased ideological unrest on the Harvard campus.

CNN's Bill Mears and Alan Silverleib contributed to this report.








Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/05/...ex.html?hpt=T1

[Rider]

She has NO experience as a judge!!!! WTF? Obama is a fucking idiot. Yeah she has a law degree and she was a Dean at Harvard law but does that qualify her to be a judge? Fuck no.

[pauldun170]

Originally Posted by Rider

She has NO experience as a judge!!!! WTF? Obama is a fucking idiot. Yeah she has a law degree and she was a Dean at Harvard law but does that qualify her to be a judge? Fuck no.

dumbass

http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/suprem...opriorexp.html

[Rider]

Originally Posted by pauldun170

dumbass

http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/suprem...opriorexp.html

Many of those held a position as a judge at some point in their career ass nuts.

[shmike]

Originally Posted by pauldun170

dumbass

http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/suprem...opriorexp.html

You had that link ready to go before you posted the article, didn't you?

[pauldun170]

Originally Posted by Rider

Many of those held a position as a judge at some point in their career ass nuts.

Oh...
Must have been confused with the page title
"Supreme Court Justices Without Prior Judicial Experience Before Becoming Justices"

That threw me off was the "Prior Occupations " column.
I thought that that the title plus the column meant that the Judges list had no prior judicial experience and the column represented the occupations that they did have prior to the nomination to supreme Court.

I guess I missed the "past lives" column.

[Rider]

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Oh...
Must have been confused with the page title
"Supreme Court Justices Without Prior Judicial Experience Before Becoming Justices"

That threw me off was the "Prior Occupations " column.
I thought that that the title plus the column meant that the Judges list had no prior judicial experience and the column represented the occupations that they did have prior to the nomination to supreme Court.

I guess I missed the "past lives" column.

Ok must have been attorney general that I was thinking of was there prior experience, not judge. I don;t give a shit about what somebody has done in the past. Still doesn't make it right.

[Trip]

It's not like judge experience is needed to vote your bias every single time. Good supreme court judges that actually rule on law instead of bias are few and far between.

[Rider]

Originally Posted by Trip

It's not like judge experience is needed to vote your bias every single time. Good supreme court judges that actually rule on law instead of bias are few and far between.

I look at it this way, would you want a pilot with 5000 hours flying your plane or do you want an air traffic controller who has been to flight school fly your plane? I'd choose the one with experience every time.

[karl_1052]

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Her confirmation also would mean that the Supreme Court would have no Protestant justices for the first time in its history. Kagan, who is Jewish, would join six Catholic and two Jewish justices; Stevens is Protestant.

I though the church and state were supposed to be separate. Why would this be relevant?