Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2009, 12:36 PM   #11
Rider
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdog View Post
Except there's no way any actual airline would outfit their plane that way. Stuff 10 more chairs in there and you might have first class on a normal airline.
Yes that is exactly how it will be laid out. This is a luxury liner, not a max capacity type plane.
Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 12:41 PM   #12
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSGregman View Post
It's about fucking time....we've been sitting on nearly a billion dollars worth of inventory related to that program for two years.

Hopefully there won't be any more surprises during the certification process and full rate production can begin next year. You guys should SEE the Dreamlifter..the heavily modified 747 Boeing uses to haul completed Section 41s out of Wichita...it's an impressive plane too.
Interesting, I'm surprised they have the Dreamlifter swing away at the tail instead of the nose. I would think it would make routing hydraulic and electrical runs to the tail a bit complex.
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 12:44 PM   #13
LeeNetworX
SFL Expatriate #1
 
LeeNetworX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ATL Burbs
Moto: '09 Triumph Speed Triple
Posts: 4,712
Default

LeeNetworX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 12:58 PM   #14
KSGregman
Get Fit...or Get OUT
 
KSGregman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: KS
Moto: 07 M109-R
Posts: 1,993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goof2 View Post
Interesting, I'm surprised they have the Dreamlifter swing away at the tail instead of the nose. I would think it would make routing hydraulic and electrical runs to the tail a bit complex.
There is NO WAY the Section 41 (nose, cockpit and forward fuselage) would fit inside the Dreamlifter if they attempted to load it via the nose. It just BARELY fits inside the extensively modified fuselage, as it is.

We've got the Carbon Fiber Facility line that manufactures the Section 41 of the 787 running again now...slowly...hoping to get up to full production rate early next year.




Last edited by KSGregman; 12-14-2009 at 01:01 PM..
KSGregman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 01:11 PM   #15
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSGregman View Post
There is NO WAY the Section 41 (nose, cockpit and forward fuselage) would fit inside the Dreamlifter if they attempted to load it via the nose. It just BARELY fits inside the extensively modified fuselage, as it is.

We've got the Carbon Fiber Facility line that manufactures the Section 41 of the 787 running again now...slowly...hoping to get up to full production rate early next year.



I see what you are talking about.

Out of curiosity do you all buy the carbon fiber or make it within the company, and is it a wet layup or do you use a pre-preg process?
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 02:12 PM   #16
Particle Man
Custom User Title
 
Particle Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSGregman View Post
that thing looks like a pregnant guppy with wings
__________________
I'm not "fat."
I'm "Enlarged to show texture."


Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away.
Particle Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 02:34 PM   #17
Speedracer42
Kneedragger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 170
Default

Some industry people had told me that during some time of the design process they were offering a $10k bonus to employees who could save a pound of weight off the aircraft. Not sure the truth behind that. But it doesn't sound too far fetched
Speedracer42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 03:04 PM   #18
Rider
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedracer42 View Post
Some industry people had told me that during some time of the design process they were offering a $10k bonus to employees who could save a pound of weight off the aircraft. Not sure the truth behind that. But it doesn't sound too far fetched
Yes this is true. Not sure of the exact amount but they were offering a bonus.
Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 04:43 PM   #19
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

that thing reminds me of the old super guppy
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 05:05 PM   #20
Avatard
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
 
Avatard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
Default

OK, so obviously a guppy-type mod on a 747 platform is possible. That thing is in fact 3 stories tall, not two...so it begs the question:

The Dreamliner was a lightweight composite, energy efficient rethink for point-to-point travel from anywhere on Earth to anywhere on Earth...something that would allow airlines a complete rethink in how they "hub"...Airbus chose an alternate strategy, and chose to become the "big dog" in the commercial airline industry with the 380 double-decker...

...and pundits have argued that Boeing's strategy is now bound to pay off better, especially given the current industry outlook...

...but now that the Dreamliner is pretty much done, why doesn't Boeing just fit some new high bypass engines, lighter composite wings, and a pop-top addition to the venerable 747 airframe, and handily eat Airbus's lunch on both fronts?
__________________
Insert free thought here.
Avatard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.