High Fructose Corn Syrup Causes More Weight Gain Than Sugar

[KSGregman]

Originally Posted by Apoc

...People shoving fistfulls of unhealthy foods down their dumb, greedy fucking mouths is.

This....exactly this.

[Avatard]

Originally Posted by Apoc

You dont get it, do you? Corn Syrop is very, very bad for you.

SO IS FUCKING TABLE SUGAR.

Sorry, table sugar is not NEARLY as bad, according to this latest research, not even at twice the dose was it as fattening as HFCS.

Reading. It's still fundamental.

...and you can get as worked up as you want, but you can't change the findings of this study. Love corn so much? Do your own study. Prove everyone wrong.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by homeslice

10?

Damn..........how many mg each?

1000

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by EpyonXero

Does that keep your coat nice and shiny?

Yes I glisten in the sun. lol

Fish oil is good for a boatload of things...heart, circulatory, nerve...etc. etc.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Get one with an enteric coating. This is what I use, from nutritionexpress

Enteric coating is crap. Just buy the ones w/o the coating and swallow them. Pussy.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Avatard

Sorry, table sugar is not NEARLY as bad, according to this latest research, not even at twice the dose was it as fattening as HFCS.

Reading. It's still fundamental.

...and you can get as worked up as you want, but you can't change the findings of this study. Love corn so much? Do your own study. Prove everyone wrong.

I think this is the jist of what you trying to say...

"High-fructose corn syrup and sucrose are both compounds that contain the simple sugars fructose and glucose, but there at least two clear differences between them. First, sucrose is composed of equal amounts of the two simple sugars -- it is 50 percent fructose and 50 percent glucose -- but the typical high-fructose corn syrup used in this study features a slightly imbalanced ratio, containing 55 percent fructose and 42 percent glucose. Larger sugar molecules called higher saccharides make up the remaining 3 percent of the sweetener. Second, as a result of the manufacturing process for high-fructose corn syrup, the fructose molecules in the sweetener are free and unbound, ready for absorption and utilization. In contrast, every fructose molecule in sucrose that comes from cane sugar or beet sugar is bound to a corresponding glucose molecule and must go through an extra metabolic step before it can be utilized."

Of course the underlying problem is still not corn, but HFCS eaten in too large of quantities with little to no exercise.

[Avatard]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

I think this is the jist of what you trying to say...

Really? What clued you in? The fact that I quoted that shit already?

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Avatard

Really? What clued you in? The fact that I quoted that shit already?

It was meant for Apoc..not you. I should have quoted him instead of you. My bad.

[Avatard]

There seems to be a fundamental difference in the way Fructose and Glucose are metabolized, and this is apparently made far worse by the ratio of these two sugars in HFCS.

It's all there in the article, if you REALLY read it.

[KSGregman]

Originally Posted by Avatard

There seems to be a fundamental difference in the way Fructose and Glucose are metabolized...

Actually, I'm more interested in the fundamental difference between the food choices that fat people make versus the food choices that fit people make.

Don't want to get fat? Eat whole foods...in sensible portion sizes every 2 hours...and exercise. PAY ATTENTION...ensure that the calories you burn off each day exceed or equal the calories you consume.

No scientific study or internet pissing contests required. It really IS that simple. *shrug*