Firefighters let home burn

[askmrjesus]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

Looking a little deeper, it seems the situation is a bit different than the linked story indicates. In order to be eligible for the $75.00 annual fee, you have to secure fire insurance. Those trailers are apparently uninsurable, so they don't even qualify for the annual fee.

http://www.kfvs12.com/story/16201834...fighters-watch

That's even more fucked up.

Your house doesn't qualify for fire insurance, so we're going to make doubly certain you walk away with nothing, by letting it burn.

Brilliant.

JC

[tommymac]

Originally Posted by askmrjesus

That's even more fucked up.

Your house doesn't qualify for fire insurance, so we're going to make doubly certain you walk away with nothing, by letting it burn.

Brilliant.

JC

I still cant wrap my head around this concept. Seems to me that you live in a town/municipality and pay taxes this is a service thats provided.

[RACER X]

Originally Posted by tommymac

I still cant wrap my head around this concept. Seems to me that you live in a town/municipality and pay taxes this is a service thats provided.

they don't live in a municipality.

and ins. won't cover them , cuz i guess they lite up faster then an old x-mas tree.

even more reason to pay for fire protection.

That's even more fucked up.

Your house doesn't qualify for fire insurance, so we're going to make doubly certain you walk away with nothing, by letting it burn.

Brilliant.

JC

who is "we're"? should the city offer insurance now?

basically paying for fire protection is their only option. and they chose not to pay. if they can't afford fire protection, odds are they couldn't afford insurance either.

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by askmrjesus

That's even more fucked up.

Your house doesn't qualify for fire insurance, so we're going to make doubly certain you walk away with nothing, by letting it burn.

Brilliant.

JC

It's definitely a bizarre requirement. This is definitely not the same situation, as the other fire last year.

[askmrjesus]

Originally Posted by RACER X

basically paying for fire protection is their only option. and they chose not to pay. if they can't afford fire protection, odds are they couldn't afford insurance either.

Dude, RIF.

They don't qualify for fire protection, because they don't qualify for fire insurance.

WTF are they supposed to do?

JC

[azoomm]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

Looking a little deeper, it seems the situation is a bit different than the linked story indicates. In order to be eligible for the $75.00 annual fee, you have to secure fire insurance. Those trailers are apparently uninsurable, so they don't even qualify for the annual fee.

http://www.kfvs12.com/story/16201834...fighters-watch

So, don't those people that can't get insurance need the fire department MORE than the others?

[pauldun170]

According to Snatch, when your trailer burns down and you mom dies you have to rig the boxing match and bet on your self. then when the crime boss gets all pissy you shoot him in the face.

fuckin' pikeys

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by azoomm

So, don't those people that can't get insurance need the fire department MORE than the others?

You would think so, wouldn't you? That's a pretty ass backwards rule.

[Tmall]

All I'm saying is, if I lock myself out of my house. I'd better be damn sure my fees are paid up. Or, I'd have to call a locksmith. Personal responsibility, right?

Some people's kids...

[fasternyou929]

Originally Posted by RACER X

they don't live in a municipality.

and ins. won't cover them , cuz i guess they lite up faster then an old x-mas tree.

even more reason to pay for fire protection.

Few things in life are more hilarious than a fucking retard trying to be condescending.