Tiger woods to payout $750m to ex-wife

[CrazyKell]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

So people who leave their cars unlocked deserve to get them stolen?

Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

You're saying that making a mistake justifies being stolen from, and that's what I'm illustrating.

What if I go over to fuck my mistress, leave my car unlocked, then get my car stolen. Does my infidelity absolve the thief of his crime?

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

So people who leave their cars unlocked deserve to get them stolen?

Taking the absolute best case for Tiger: People who do drug deals run the risk of getting jacked.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

Taking the absolute best case for Tiger: People who do drug deals run the risk of getting jacked.

So if you want to steal without being a thief you should only steal from drug dealers or buyers?

[CrazyKell]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

You're saying that making a mistake justifies being stolen from, and that's what I'm illustrating.

What if I go over to fuck my mistress, leave my car unlocked, then get my car stolen. Does my infidelity absolve the thief of his crime?

Nowhere did I say that anything justifies anything. I simply stated the fact that he made a mistake (didn't even say what it was as some would argue it was the infidelity and others would argue it was the getting caught) and the other fact is that now he is paying for that mistake.

I personally believe that he shouldn't have gotten married or had kids in the first place. Or he should've married someone that was okay with the gross level of infidelity he displayed.

Now if his car got broken into while he was commiting the adultery....well that's a whole other story.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

Nowhere did I say that anything justifies anything. I simply stated the fact that he made a mistake (didn't even say what it was as some would argue it was the infidelity and others would argue it was the getting caught) and the other fact is that now he is paying for that mistake.

I personally believe that he shouldn't have gotten married or had kids in the first place. Or he should've married someone that was okay with the gross level of infidelity he displayed.

Now if his car got broken into while he was commiting the adultery....well that's a whole other story.

But this thread is about the payout, not about the original infidelity. And since we're discussing the payout, I want her called out for the money-grubbing, thieving, whore she is. That's all.

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

So if you want to steal without being a thief you should only steal from drug dealers or buyers?

OK, how about the simple reality then. This isn't theft; it's a breach of contract case. Woods made a deal. He failed to abide by the contract that he signed. He now pays the penalties for that breach. It's really that simple.

If you can't abide by the terms of a contract, don't sign it.

[CrazyKell]

Isn't the whole situation kind of one big clusterfuck? How could you possibly extricate the payout from the original sin? The reason the payout is so high is because this isn't just your typical "irreconcilable differences" kind of divorce.

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

I agree that those that cheat on their spouses deserve to be punished, quite frankly, it should still be illegal. That being said, I don't agree with all this monetary payout stuff. $100,000,000? That's ridiculous. Maybe if she had taught him how to play golf or something but exactly how was she instrumental is his earning of wealth? If they started a business together, maybe but he was already rich when they met. I've never believed that an adult deserves to be paid by the other adult after a divorce... she should go get a job. He has already supported her in the lap of luxury for however long they have been together, she hasn't worked akaik. She has gotten all of her needs fulfilled and her wishes granted. Heck, if you want to do a financial analysis of the situation, she owes him money! Of course you all realize that this doesn't include whatever the child support is going to be.... Fixed and single is where it's at, baby!!!

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

OK, how about the simple reality then. This isn't theft; it's a breach of contract case. Woods made a deal. He failed to abide by the contract that he signed. He now pays the penalties for that breach. It's really that simple.

If you can't abide by the terms of a contract, don't sign it.

Bullshit. She has the choice to do the right thing and not steal something she did nothing for.

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

Isn't the whole situation kind of one big clusterfuck? How could you possibly extricate the payout from the original sin? The reason the payout is so high is because this isn't just your typical "irreconcilable differences" kind of divorce.

Doesn't make a bit of difference. She's taking what she didn't earn, that's stealing.

I'm not saying she's broken a law and deserves to be in jail. I'm saying that deep in her heart, she's a thief and a whore. Stealing $100 million dollars is a much worse action than fucking a bunch of willing women.