Another Extreme Home Makeover Family Faces Foreclosure - Page 4

Papa_Complex · 12-02-2009, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170

You should be banned though for posting that as it offends Wiccans and Scientologists

I also don't see gay Zoroastrians on the list. Freddy Mercury is rolling over in his grave.

goof2 · 12-02-2009, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gas Man

Yeah... but why send them to classes when you can send them to Disney!

Maybe they should have a financial counselor dress up as Mickey or something and sit them down for a couple hours. Either way it seems some of these people think they hit the lotto and act accordingly.

goof2 · 12-02-2009, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

Bit of a threadjack but I heard that Habitat for Humanity also has a forced religious component. This I'm not in support of. But I suppose if I were in the families position I'd suck it up and do it anyways.

As others have stated this isn't true if you believe Habitat's statements. They are a Christian organization but neither their supporters nor their beneficiaries are required to go along with it. I can't say it would bother me too much if they did have that requirement either since whatever they are doing seems to be working.

Papa_Complex · 12-02-2009, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2

As others have stated this isn't true if you believe Habitat's statements. They are a Christian organization but neither their supporters nor their beneficiaries are required to go along with it. I can't say it would bother me too much if they did have that requirement either since whatever they are doing seems to be working.

I agree that they don't have that requirement, that they are effective, and I donate to them on occasion. I also tend to think that if they had such requirements, then they would be somewhat less..... Christian.

CrazyKell · 12-02-2009, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2

As others have stated this isn't true if you believe Habitat's statements. They are a Christian organization but neither their supporters nor their beneficiaries are required to go along with it. I can't say it would bother me too much if they did have that requirement either since whatever they are doing seems to be working.

As others have stated and cleared up.....I wasn't aware. Maybe if they were like that before and aren't now...I don't know. Good to know though.

Apoc · 12-02-2009, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyKell

As others have stated and cleared up.....I wasn't aware. Maybe if they were like that before and aren't now...I don't know. Good to know though.

Ive heard it before too kell.

Possibly it was in the past. Or perhaps it was a Canadian HfH thing.

CrazyKell · 12-02-2009, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apoc

Ive heard it before too kell.

Possibly it was in the past. Or perhaps it was a Canadian HfH thing.

Ya maybe. Crazy Canucks.

goof2 · 12-02-2009, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

I agree that they don't have that requirement, that they are effective, and I donate to them on occasion. I also tend to think that if they had such requirements, then they would be somewhat less..... Christian.

I wouldn't speculate on that. What I will speculate on is having such a requirement would alienate a lot of potential donors of both time and money making them somewhat less effective.