I just solved the middle east problem - Page 5

derf · 12-14-2009, 12:12 AM

Ebbs those all look more like kahzakstan, and nepal, possibly even mongolia.

Anyway you do gotta crack some eggs to make an omlet

Amber Lamps · 12-14-2009, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by derf

Ebbs those all look more like kahzakstan, and nepal, possibly even mongolia.

Anyway you do gotta crack some eggs to make an omlet

If you leave the eggs alone, they'll eventually rot and die... I wish we could do that with the Middle East. They hate us when we trade with them, they hate us when we don't. We give them aid, they hate us... so we stop and they hate us more. I'm really tired of these bastards to tell you the truth! Now I understand how Yahweh felt when he dealt with these tribes in the old testament! What a bunch of ingrates!!!

101lifts2 · 12-14-2009, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIGGER

I guess that you believe that Iran has nothing to do with terrorism either...

like I said, I would rather not be in this situation to begin with....

The issue isn't whether there are terrorist IN Iran, but rather does the government habor them. I don't know, but wouldn't you think we should only be concerned about stopping terrorists from committing more destruction on U.S. soil rather than ending terrorism? The latter which you simply cannot do, convienently left out of discussions because without a war on something politicians do not get elected.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIGGER

....In your opinion, do you think that we should have stayed out of WWI, WWII, Korea, etc? What's the real difference? .....

WW1: German U-boats entered the eastern U.S. water territory. I think they sunk a British ship bound for NY which was the main reason we went to war. There was also the fact that the U.S. had strong monetary relations with France and England (like they owed us money). Justified IMO.

WW2: Pearl Harbor...need I say more? Justified IMO.

Korea: U.S. didn't want the Soviets to spread Communism. This is a war we shouldn't have been in.

Vietnam: Fuck the French, this is a war we shouldn't have been in.

Rangerscott · 12-14-2009, 01:02 AM

Well. I havent solved any problems but I did save a lot of money switch "from" geico.

Amber Lamps · 12-14-2009, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

The issue isn't whether there are terrorist IN Iran, but rather does the government habor them. I don't know, but wouldn't you think we should only be concerned about stopping terrorists from committing more destruction on U.S. soil rather than ending terrorism? The latter which you simply cannot do, convienently left out of discussions because without a war on something politicians do not get elected.

WW1: German U-boats entered the eastern U.S. water territory. I think they sunk a British ship bound for NY which was the main reason we went to war. There was also the fact that the U.S. had strong monetary relations with France and England (like they owed us money). Justified IMO.

WW2: Pearl Harbor...need I say more? Justified IMO.

Korea: U.S. didn't want the Soviets to spread Communism. This is a war we shouldn't have been in.

Vietnam: Fuck the French, this is a war we shouldn't have been in.

WWI the Germans sank a boat full of munitions to aid it's enemies and it wasn't in US waters. We were already poking our noses in. If another country was aiding a faction that we were at war with, what would we do?

WWII Pearl Harbor was a Japanese reaction to our Imperialist policies in their back yard. Not to mention our meddling in the Pacific rim.

It's all perspective my friend. You can justify the wars that you approve of and I can condemn them. There were a myriad of reasons that we went to war against Iraq. Whether or not you agree with them in hindsight makes very little difference now. Personally, I think that we should have concentrated on Afghanistan. Iraq could have waited.

Mr Lefty · 12-14-2009, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by derf

Ebbs those all look more like kahzakstan, and nepal, possibly even mongolia.

Anyway you do gotta crack some eggs to make an omlet

that's the first part of their trip

but most were taken here... in the Wakhan Vally

marko138 · 12-14-2009, 08:59 AM

I'm still not convinced, ebbers

Papa_Complex · 12-14-2009, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIGGER

Especially if they happen to um, destroy one of our landmarks and kill over 3,000 civilians!!!

Kabul is still on the map.

karl_1052 · 12-14-2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIGGER

I've said it before, if it were up to me, we'd take over Canada and Mexico, sit tight and let the rest of the world take care of itself.

Already tried and failed.

Papa_Complex · 12-14-2009, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karl_1052

Already tried and failed.

They wanted a new White House anyway.

12-14-2009, 12:12 AM	#41
derf token jewboy Join Date: Nov 2008 Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man Posts: 10,799	Ebbs those all look more like kahzakstan, and nepal, possibly even mongolia. Anyway you do gotta crack some eggs to make an omlet __________________

12-14-2009, 01:02 AM	#44
Rangerscott Viff6N Mutated Warrior Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Texas Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N Posts: 8,704	Well. I havent solved any problems but I did save a lot of money switch "from" geico.