Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > News Desk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2011, 11:21 AM   #41
Homeslice
Elitist
 
Homeslice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
Default

Getting back to the point of this article, so far no one has provided a justification for why an oil company should be treated like a manufacturing company for tax break purposes.

Other than powerful lobbying, of course.
Homeslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 11:21 AM   #42
Avatard
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
 
Avatard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
Default

"Trickle-Down" (AKA "VooDoo") economics:

An American term, for how the rich piss on your head, and tell you it's raining.
__________________
Insert free thought here.
Avatard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 11:25 AM   #43
Switch
dadbod
 
Switch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East TN
Posts: 1,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
Who do you think your beloved rulers are?
Why do you say "beloved"? I never said anything about loving my "rulers."
__________________
It's fine.
Switch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 11:29 AM   #44
Homeslice
Elitist
 
Homeslice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
Default

Too bad most rich people don't employ anyone. Rather, they get a salary (as a CEO, athlete, entertainer, investment banker, etc.).

The % of rich people who actually started their own business and hired a bunch of people is low.

Most get hired to do a specific job, then they last for about 18-36 months before bailing on a golden parachute.

And all the while, they are hiring accountants to figure out ways to lower their effective tax rate to that of a middle-class person (or even lower). Furthermore, many of them hide their investments overseas.

I used to be like you some of you guys.......I worshipped Reagan, thought he was cool, until I realized that the only reason I did so was because I wanted to "align" myself with "clean-cut upper-crust preppies", rather than what I perceived to be "burnouts" (hippie Democrats).

Last edited by Homeslice; 04-27-2011 at 11:54 AM..
Homeslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 11:32 AM   #45
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Switch View Post
Reaganomics is bullshit. That POS was the one who introduced corporations into government.
Ever hear of "The Military-Industrial Complex"? That intermingling of corporations and government was around back when Reagan was still hosting a TV show.
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 12:02 PM   #46
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeslice View Post
Too bad most rich people don't employ anyone. Rather, they get a salary (as a CEO, athlete, entertainer, investment banker, etc.).

The % of rich people who actually started their own business and hired a bunch of people is low.

Most get hired to do a specific job, then they last for about 18-36 months before bailing on a golden parachute.

And all the while, they are hiring accountants to figure out ways to lower their effective tax rate to that of a middle-class person (or even lower). Furthermore, many of them hide their investments overseas.

I used to be like you some of you guys.......I worshipped Reagan, thought he was cool, until I realized that the only reason I did so was because I wanted to "align" myself with "clean-cut upper-crust preppies", rather than what I perceived to be "burnouts" (hippie Democrats).

Show your work 'slice.

Your thoughts are so erratic it is hard to counter them all.

CEO's don't have employees? Athletes and entertainers have golden parachutes?

Show me a person earning a 7, 8 or 9 figure income and paying a 4.7% effective rate and I'll show you a person the IRS is looking for.

Quote:
Middle-income Americans are now paying federal taxes at or near historically low levels, according to the latest available data. That’s true whether it comes to their federal income taxes or their total federal taxes.

Income taxes: A family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 4.7 percent of its income in federal income taxes this year, according to a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. This is the third-lowest percentage in the past 50 years, after 2008 and 2009.
Overall federal taxes: Middle-income households are paying overall federal taxes — which include income as well as payroll and excise taxes — at or near their lowest levels in decades, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3151
__________________
Racing For Smiles
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 12:15 PM   #47
Homeslice
Elitist
 
Homeslice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
Default

I'm not sure why I need to show my work. I'm "middle class", or maybe "upper middle", and I paid what, 28-29% or whatever the heck my bracket is? I forgot.

I'm not a family, and I didn't have anything worth deducting this year, so my ability to reduce that is practically nill.

Not sure where they're getting 4.7% from.

And do you deny my claim that rich people are more likely to 1) use an accountant, 2) identify & make use of creative deductions, and 3) shelter money overseas?
Homeslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 12:18 PM   #48
Homeslice
Elitist
 
Homeslice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
Default

By the way, yes CEO's have tons of subordinates, but in most cases they already existed before he came onboard.

ONLY if he successfully GROWS the business can he lay claim to helping create jobs.
Homeslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 12:27 PM   #49
anthonyk
WERA White Plate
 
anthonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Moto: '01 Aprilia Falco
Posts: 1,041
Default

Yeah, I think the misstep in logic is assuming that if you tax rich folks, you affect jobs. The personal taxation of a CEO isn't likely to affect the number of jobs available in their company. Taxing the company would have a bigger effect. Unless someone can prove a link between high-income income tax and job growth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeslice
Not sure where they're getting 4.7% from.
It takes about 2 minutes of reading to find that out. It's the effective tax rate, after deductions and credits. BTW, the median income in 2010 according to them is a bit above $76k.

Last edited by anthonyk; 04-27-2011 at 12:31 PM..
anthonyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 12:32 PM   #50
Papa_Complex
Nomadic Tribesman
 
Papa_Complex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyk View Post
Yeah, I think the misstep in logic is assuming that if you tax rich folks, you affect jobs. The personal taxation of a CEO isn't likely to affect the number of jobs available in their company. Taxing the company would have a bigger effect. Unless someone can prove a link between high-income income tax and job growth.
It's one of those ideological assumptions, that's "so obvious" that people who agree with it, will never question it.
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising"

http://www.morallyambiguous.net/
Papa_Complex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.