Strict Abortion Measures Enacted in Oklahoma

[Trip]

Originally Posted by The Chi

"They" say they dont do the procedures because a woman could change their mind and that when a woman reaches 25 they will consider it, but Dr's still refuse to do it until a woman is well beyond her child bearing years, making it often redundant. If you already have a child or 2, they will do it because you've had your children annd apparently its not until you have one that you know you dont want any. Or anymore.

It's the same reason abortion isn't really a viable solution, but this debate would need to be shifted to the war room for me to continue.

[azoomm]

Originally Posted by Trip

There are mental ramifications to men, we have emotions and our experiences effect us contrary to popular stereotype.

This is all a power game, it's that simple. No one actually wants it to be "fair."

No, I understand that.

But, you have ZERO physical ramifications. That is why it's skewed.

[Trip]

Originally Posted by azoomm

Don't put your dick in the hole and you won't be any part of the equation.

Why is it never don't put your hole near a dick? You are just continuing the sexual inequality when you always refer to it in such a manner.

[Kaneman]

If chics didn't want to have to deal with different physical ramifications then they should've been born with dicks.

[the chi]

You're not exactly correct Trip. The mental and physical ramifications on a woman on choosing whether or not to have a child a FAR MORE than they are for a man. This isnt something you can even argue as you pretty just wont ever know.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by Trip

It's the same reason abortion isn't really a viable solution, but this debate would need to be shifted to the war room for me to continue.

I was wondering why someone would make a post about abortion and NOT put it in the War Room.

[the chi]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

If chics didn't want to have to deal with different physical ramifications then they should've been born with dicks.

[Trip]

Originally Posted by azoomm

No, I understand that.

But, you have ZERO physical ramifications. That is why it's skewed.

So what kind of risk would you give abortion? Is it only an option when life is at risk or is it an option whenever you just decide pregnancy just doesn't fit you? Either it is a viable solution with minimal risk or it is a destructive practice....

[the chi]

Originally Posted by Trip

So what kind of risk would you give abortion? Is it only an option when life is at risk or is it an option whenever you just decide pregnancy just doesn't fit you? Either it is a viable solution with minimal risk or it is a destructive practice....

And thats the crux of it right there. You have summed almost the whole argument in that very last sentence.

The problem isnt when its used as a viable solution, its when its used SOLEY as a destructive practice that is the real issue with abortion. Sadly, too many use is only as the latter.

Even when viable however it is still a horrible decision to have to make and the repercussions are long ranging.

[Trip]

Originally Posted by The Chi

You're not exactly correct Trip. The mental and physical ramifications on a woman on choosing whether or not to have a child a FAR MORE than they are for a man. This isnt something you can even argue as you pretty just wont ever know.

There are no physical ramifications, but a man will have to deal with a lot of mental ramifications of refusing to be part of a childs life. However, you have now just put weight on ending a child's life instead of just birth control. Abortion is either viable option of birth control or it's something more.