|
11-02-2011, 01:57 PM | #1 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Richmond, Tx
Moto: '10 Tuono Factory
Posts: 4,569
|
homes of the 99%ers
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ 2014 GROM! 181cc of FURY 2010 Aprilia Tuono Factory - SOLD 2009 SFV Gladius - SOLD 2008 Hayabusa - SOLD. |
11-02-2011, 01:59 PM | #2 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Try that in California or NY, though
|
11-02-2011, 02:38 PM | #3 |
Ride Like an Asshole
Join Date: Feb 2008
Moto: nothing...
Posts: 11,254
|
No wonder they are freaking out...
|
11-02-2011, 02:43 PM | #4 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Richmond, Tx
Moto: '10 Tuono Factory
Posts: 4,569
|
thats the jist of the article, these houses/addresses of those arrested are not in the 99%, more realistically the 1% they are protesting against.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ 2014 GROM! 181cc of FURY 2010 Aprilia Tuono Factory - SOLD 2009 SFV Gladius - SOLD 2008 Hayabusa - SOLD. |
11-02-2011, 03:00 PM | #5 |
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
1. Home addresses - Doesn't mean they own them. I'm guessing we're looking at "Mom and Dads" house here.
2. Having wealth doesn't make them hypocritical. 3. 5 houses. Thats it? So is the argument that the link is pushing "Those who have (or come from) money should not participate in this protest because to do so would be hypocritical"? What if one of the arrested protestors actually owned the property in question. Lets say they even worked for a financial institution. Are they not allowed to talk about issues they see in the environment they work in? I'm going to have rate this article as a "meh" |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|