hot lookin chic, get fired!

[Avatard]

Nipples aren't the issue here. That woman sticks out in all the right places; nipples notwithstanding. Even if the "high beams" weren't on, it's not like her "HID" curves aren't lighting up the fucking room wherever she goes anyway...and that's not her fault, nor should she be forced to over-compensate in any way, and dress like a fucking nun, or wear a fucking burka. It is what it is.

[Apoc]

And it is yummy...

[Smittie61984]

Originally Posted by Tsunami

Or they can fire the guys that are harrassing her. I didn't see anything wrong with the way she was dressed except that she really shouldnt have her nipples poking out at the office. WTF its not a nigthclub.

If they fire some guys for harrasing her then the Citibank execs need to just go ahead and hand over the keys to their Benzes becuase she'll be driving it home once she goes to court with a bonified sexual harrasement case.

I really wish I could see some pics of what she actually wore to the office and if it is really what she is portraying to the media. Someone had to get some pics of her on their phones at some point in time.

Then I wish I could see some pics/video of her taking it up the ass.

[Tsunami]

Originally Posted by Avatard

Nipples aren't the issue here. That woman sticks out in all the right places; nipples notwithstanding. Even if the "high beams" weren't on, it's not like her "HID" curves aren't lighting up the fucking room wherever she goes anyway...and that's not her fault, nor should she be forced to over-compensate in any way, and dress like a fucking nun, or wear a fucking burka. It is what it is.

Its hard to cover up all those curves but she can cover up those nipples! Aside from that she is very covered. I wear lots of tight stuff, and have worn skimpier at the office, but heck I don't look like that! If I did though, I wouldn't want to have to be more nun like. She is dressing just like everyone else, just looks way better doing it.

[Papa_Complex]

I wouldn't have to think twice about this issue (she's right), if it wasn't for some of the shots she has posed for, that made UK papers.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...ttractive.html

[Apoc]

Modeling for a shot has nothing to do with workin g at citibank. And likely they were taken after she was fired.

I fail to see how a woman dressing like a woman, should be fired for being gorgeous.

[azoomm]

What if she was a bitch that walked the fine line for years, and her manager had just enough of her bullshit. And, she just happened to be good looking?

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by Apoc

Modeling for a shot has nothing to do with workin g at citibank. And likely they were taken after she was fired.

I fail to see how a woman dressing like a woman, should be fired for being gorgeous.

The question that it raises in my mind is whether she was an attention whore, all along. I'm not saying that it's what I think, but rather a question that posing for such shots, even after the fact, raises in my mind.

Let's just say that it doesn't ADD to her credibility.

[defector]

Saw something about this on the news last week. Said something about she was having issues securing new accounts. What was her job title?

[Avatard]

Originally Posted by defector

Saw something about this on the news last week. Said something about she was having issues securing new accounts. What was her job title?

Goddess. Apparently, that doesn't work in the corporate world.