She can cheer anytime...

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

playboy is on the same level as art in a museum? cause the only people i see people wailin' in the museum are homeless people.

I think he is talking about how the pictures are taking. Playboy is soft porn. They try to show you a beautiful woman in a beautiful or sexy picture. A hardcore mag will give you the spread eagle so you can see her guts by looking in her cooter.

There is a big difference.

I asked my wife if she would have a problem with a teacher that posed in Playboy, teaching our daughter to be a cheerleader. Right away she said no she wouldn't have a problem with it.

James

[NONE_too_SOFT]

Originally Posted by Flexin

I think he is talking about how the pictures are taking. Playboy is soft porn. They try to show you a beautiful woman in a beautiful or sexy picture. A hardcore mag will give you the spread eagle so you can see her guts by looking in her cooter.

There is a big difference.

I asked my wife if she would have a problem with a teacher that posed in Playboy, teaching our daughter to be a cheerleader. Right away she said no she wouldn't have a problem with it.

James

different strokes for different folks. porn is porn in my opinion, i dont care how "classy" you think u are, truckers are still jerkin it to your picture in the back of gas station bathroom.

Maybe when i have kids some day i'll care a little less and allow them to be taught by porn stars, but since i dont have any i guess my opinion isnt really valid.

[Rangerscott]

I usually do the slow stroke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkgMbU-we1o

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

different strokes for different folks. porn is porn in my opinion, i dont care how "classy" you think u are, truckers are still jerkin it to your picture in the back of gas station bathroom.

Maybe when i have kids some day i'll care a little less and allow them to be taught by porn stars, but since i dont have any i guess my opinion isnt really valid.

People jerk to the Sears bra section. Does that make it porn? I'm sure there are a few million SI swimsuit issues with pages stuck together. Still doesn't make it porn.

And it doesn't matter that you don't have kids. Peoples opinions change over time and having kids can change them. But I don't think your opinion on this topic will change much when you have kids. There is a better chance for some people to switch to your opinion after having kids.

It doesn't matter is someone gets naked for money or for free. What matters is they care about teaching and can make you child learn what they are teaching.

I willing to guess that not one student was taught how to pose for Playboy by that teacher. So it doesn't matter that she did it.

The only problem it could cause is some kids trying texting pictures of her nude in class and so on.

The point is you need to raise your own kids. Don't look for others to raise them. And try to be a role model for them. Nobody is perfect.

James

[Homeslice]

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

playboy is on the same level as art in a museum? cause the only people i see people wailin' in the museum are homeless people.

What he's saying is that there isn't much difference btw Playboy and old paintings of nude women. Both were done in the appreciation of women. They aren't showing them spread-eagle or having sex w/someone like real porn is.

Why is a painting of a nude woman OK? Just cuz it's paint, not photo? Well, magazine photos are so damn airbrushed that they look like paint anyway, so what's the difference as long as they aren't showing the cootie.

[zed]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

What he's saying is that there isn't much difference btw Playboy and old paintings of nude women. Both were done in the appreciation of women. They aren't showing them spread-eagle or having sex w/someone like real porn is.

Why is a painting of a nude woman OK? Just cuz it's paint, not photo? Well, magazine photos are so damn airbrushed that they look like paint anyway, so what's the difference as long as they aren't showing the cootie.

which is why the best part of a Playboy is the jokes and toons scattered throughout the mag. if I want to look at porn, there better be pink and a few other activities going on.

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by zed

which is why the best part of a Playboy is the jokes and toons scattered throughout the mag. if I want to look at porn, there better be pink and a few other activities going on.

I enjoy the nasty porn myself but I still enjoy the Playboy stuff. A sexy woman who knows how to work it can make my knees weak in a snow suit.

James

[zed]

Originally Posted by Flexin

I enjoy the nasty porn myself but I still enjoy the Playboy stuff. A sexy woman who knows how to work it can make my knees weak in a snow suit.

James

yeah but like has been said, those pictures in Playboy have been worked over so much that they really aren't the same woman any more and the sad thing is, you can still see the touch ups. OK, I have looked at the pictures and maybe a little too closely sometimes.

[NONE_too_SOFT]

Originally Posted by Flexin

People jerk to the Sears bra section. Does that make it porn? I'm sure there are a few million SI swimsuit issues with pages stuck together. Still doesn't make it porn.

And it doesn't matter that you don't have kids. Peoples opinions change over time and having kids can change them. But I don't think your opinion on this topic will change much when you have kids. There is a better chance for some people to switch to your opinion after having kids.

It doesn't matter is someone gets naked for money or for free. What matters is they care about teaching and can make you child learn what they are teaching.

I willing to guess that not one student was taught how to pose for Playboy by that teacher. So it doesn't matter that she did it.

The only problem it could cause is some kids trying texting pictures of her nude in class and so on.

The point is you need to raise your own kids. Don't look for others to raise them. And try to be a role model for them. Nobody is perfect.

James

Originally Posted by Homeslice

What he's saying is that there isn't much difference btw Playboy and old paintings of nude women. Both were done in the appreciation of women. They aren't showing them spread-eagle or having sex w/someone like real porn is.

Why is a painting of a nude woman OK? Just cuz it's paint, not photo? Well, magazine photos are so damn airbrushed that they look like paint anyway, so what's the difference as long as they aren't showing the cootie.

Because somebody jerks off to something doesnt make it porn. Im sure you've jerked off to images the brazilian water polo team, but they are certainly not porno actors, they just get u off.

Sears is selling undies, playboy is selling sex. playboy is porn. Just because u buy into playboys marketing scheme to make it "high brow" "classy" porn does not mean the implications behind it are any different.

The sheer fact that you point out they are airbrushed exemplifies my point. In art the minuscule details and subtle flaws are what bring life to the canvas, where in playboy they are trying to simulate what ur seeing when u close ur eyes in the broom closet and spank one out to Sao Paulo on ur lunch break.

[Smittie61984]

Originally Posted by Rangerscott

I usually do the slow stroke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkgMbU-we1o

Haaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaaaa.

The slow stroke. fucking awesome!