04-10-2012, 05:47 PM | #11 | |
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
Quote:
Freedom isn't free.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
04-10-2012, 07:58 PM | #12 | |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2012, 08:40 PM | #13 | |
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Quote:
(Well I don't actually have to write a check. They just take it out of my paycheck) I write another check to the state government for $7000. Its for use of state land (also known as real estate taxes) I fill out a bunch of forms in the first quarter each year to make sure I've paid up all my bills to the federal government. On a couple of items, the government throws in some freebies. A package deal if you will. Buy one get one free kinda of stuff. Government says if you do certain things we'll cut you a break. On of those things is financing a home. Government says...dont sweat the interest you pay on your mortgage because the bank is already paying taxes on that amount and we like people buying houses. I say ok sweet deal. On the interwebz "OMG they are giving those homeowners money!!!" um no they are not. |
|
04-10-2012, 09:56 PM | #14 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
|
04-11-2012, 08:09 AM | #15 | |
Nomadic Tribesman
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
|
Quote:
On the other hand, you have people saying that the government is giving you back a percentage of a percentage, of money that they already took from you. Seriously, which is the more likely scenario?
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising" http://www.morallyambiguous.net/ |
|
04-11-2012, 12:47 PM | #16 | |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Quote:
But, some taxes are federal and some aren't. For example, property taxes aren't federal. If anything, this deduction should be on a state level, not federal. Think about it this way. If I live in an expensive state like NY or CA, and my mortgage principal is $750K, I'm getting a pretty decent deduction from the feds --- Which is being taken out of ALL taxpayer's pockets, across the country. How does that make sense? Why not have each state manage it themselves, instead of forcing people in Mississippi to partially subsidize the deductions of people in CA? |
|
04-11-2012, 01:03 PM | #17 | |
Nomadic Tribesman
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
|
Quote:
From a standpoint of which level of government should be doing it, I would say that you're right. It would make more sense as a tool to drive the local economy, via State government, rather than coming from the Federal level.
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising" http://www.morallyambiguous.net/ |
|
04-13-2012, 02:19 PM | #18 |
SFL Expatriate #1
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ATL Burbs
Moto: '09 Triumph Speed Triple
Posts: 4,712
|
Internet: Chock full of legal and financial genius.
|
04-13-2012, 02:26 PM | #19 | |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm not "fat." I'm "Enlarged to show texture." Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|