Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2009, 07:07 PM   #91
Corey
AMA Supersport
 
Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Moto: Not a damn thing
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
taiwan decided to build its own fighter when their tigershark order went south. mostly serves with the republic of china airforce.

Interesting. The nose looks kinda Sukoy-ish. What's the performance equivalent? F-16? F-18? F-4?
__________________
Half man, half horse, half motorcycle. All awesome.

"Your game is shit, your company is shit. Activision ruined you! Activision ruined you." - Francis
Corey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 07:10 PM   #92
Adeptus_Minor
Hopster
 
Adeptus_Minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Moto: 2009 Buell 1125R
Posts: 4,743
Default

Almost looks like it splits the different between an F18 and a Sukhoi
__________________
“Well, obviously before; after was all gendarmes and dick stitches.”
Adeptus_Minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 07:46 PM   #93
pauldun170
Serious Business
 
pauldun170's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
taiwan decided to build its own fighter when their tigershark order went south. mostly serves with the republic of china airforce.

That thing is tiny....BUT it works for Taiwan. Unit Costs aren't as horrendous as they could have been.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
feed your dogs root beer it will make them grow large and then you can ride them and pet the motorcycle while drinking root beer
pauldun170 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 07:58 AM   #94
Phenix_Rider
WERA White Plate
 
Phenix_Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Moto: Ninja 650R
Posts: 1,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldun170 View Post
The F-15E's should still be in decent enough shape despite all the hours being put on the airframes. The C's...I wonder if the restrictions are still up on em.

C130 FTW!!! and the duct tape....and the bugee cord....I think the markets where the build it under license have better C130's (as in airworthy) than we do. Ours are stuffed with cooler toys though from time to time.
There are new C130 models coming out all the time. The J came out a couple years back with more efficient engines, newer electronics, more cargo capacity, etc. And some of the older ones have ridiculously cool stuff in the back. My dad worked on EC130s way back. A favorite story deals with accidentally jamming some TV stations No bungee cords or duct tape involved. Getting the right parts at the right time they had trouble with, mostly because some moron felt he had to protect his turf instead of doing his job.

Defense contracts should absolutely stay in the US. Does anyone think North Korea or Vietnam or China should be making parts for our equipment? The political infighting about who's district gets the contract is bullshit though. It costs more money than actually producing, utilizing, and maintaining. Look at NASA- you got electronics being built in one part of the country, airframes in another, engines somewhere else, assembly somewhere else, and launch/recovery in three other places. All because some bureaucrat had to pork his area.
__________________
Quote:
So you think you're ready to ride? So if i ran up to you with a belt sander would you feel safe????
Phenix_Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 08:45 AM   #95
Papa_Complex
Nomadic Tribesman
 
Papa_Complex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
Default

That Taiwanese fighter reminds me of a cross between a Dassault Rafale and a F-16.
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising"

http://www.morallyambiguous.net/
Papa_Complex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 10:12 AM   #96
pauldun170
Serious Business
 
pauldun170's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenix_Rider View Post
There are new C130 models coming out all the time. The J came out a couple years back with more efficient engines, newer electronics, more cargo capacity, etc. And some of the older ones have ridiculously cool stuff in the back. My dad worked on EC130s way back. A favorite story deals with accidentally jamming some TV stations No bungee cords or duct tape involved. Getting the right parts at the right time they had trouble with, mostly because some moron felt he had to protect his turf instead of doing his job.

Defense contracts should absolutely stay in the US. Does anyone think North Korea or Vietnam or China should be making parts for our equipment? The political infighting about who's district gets the contract is bullshit though. It costs more money than actually producing, utilizing, and maintaining. Look at NASA- you got electronics being built in one part of the country, airframes in another, engines somewhere else, assembly somewhere else, and launch/recovery in three other places. All because some bureaucrat had to pork his area.
How many of the new C130's are going to the US military and not to foreign buyers?

As for joint development or competitive contracts (Why develop and buy a US made helicopter or light vehicle if foreign companies offer an existing or superior product) any of our Nato partners or other "pact" countries should be considered.
After that...licenced production of components by American company for a foreign design is a solution to the "jobs and availabilty" problem.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
feed your dogs root beer it will make them grow large and then you can ride them and pet the motorcycle while drinking root beer

Last edited by pauldun170; 02-27-2009 at 10:16 AM..
pauldun170 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 11:40 AM   #97
smileyman
White Trash Hero
 
smileyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
Default

Industrius little Tiawanese! Looks like they were smart enough not to try and reinvent the wheel and went with proven concepts from alot of different established fighters. Cuts out a huge chunk of the R&D budget. Still not something I want to be riding in when a Raptor comes calling!
__________________

Arkriders.com
To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst!
smileyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 12:07 PM   #98
pauldun170
Serious Business
 
pauldun170's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smileyman View Post
Industrius little Tiawanese! Looks like they were smart enough not to try and reinvent the wheel and went with proven concepts from alot of different established fighters. Cuts out a huge chunk of the R&D budget. Still not something I want to be riding in when a Raptor comes calling!
Cuteness factor = CHECK
Engine performance = huh? wad dat?
Radar = Let's just say...we have a very close relationship with ground control and awacs. Not the worst but...it's appropriate for the class.
Flight performance = as long as it doesn't involve climbing to altitude it rocks!!
Armament = ok mix for what it's intended to do.


I think the goal, at least in the air superiority arena is to avoid China' s AAM by confusing them with it's size and cuteness (missile get's close to the ching kuo and goes "awe!! how cute.....damn where it go?)

Then...when China's comparatively massive Su-27,33 etc etc roll up to pull a Han Solo maneuver ...
the ching kuo will expertly tuck itself between the nacelles of the Chinese fighter, the pilot will use suction cups and make his way towards the intake and then throw old Timex watches in to the engines.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
feed your dogs root beer it will make them grow large and then you can ride them and pet the motorcycle while drinking root beer
pauldun170 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 12:11 PM   #99
smileyman
White Trash Hero
 
smileyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
Default

__________________

Arkriders.com
To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst!
smileyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 02:19 PM   #100
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldun170 View Post
Cuteness factor = CHECK
Engine performance = huh? wad dat?
Radar = Let's just say...we have a very close relationship with ground control and awacs. Not the worst but...it's appropriate for the class.
Flight performance = as long as it doesn't involve climbing to altitude it rocks!!
Armament = ok mix for what it's intended to do.


I think the goal, at least in the air superiority arena is to avoid China' s AAM by confusing them with it's size and cuteness (missile get's close to the ching kuo and goes "awe!! how cute.....damn where it go?)

Then...when China's comparatively massive Su-27,33 etc etc roll up to pull a Han Solo maneuver ...
the ching kuo will expertly tuck itself between the nacelles of the Chinese fighter, the pilot will use suction cups and make his way towards the intake and then throw old Timex watches in to the engines.
lmao oddly enough so do japanese pilots of f1s. Better example for overseas contractors, mitsubishi f2
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.