11-25-2009, 08:53 AM | #11 | |
Hold mah beer!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 80 Miles South of Moto Heaven
Moto: 08 R1200GS
Posts: 23,268
|
I'm going with this one. It's more about rider goals/ability vs where you start.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-25-2009, 10:16 AM | #12 |
Letzroll
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
|
From the choices given I'll go with Option B.
|
11-25-2009, 10:24 AM | #13 |
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Option B.
Not to say that there are not some excellent cruiser riders out there.... |
11-25-2009, 02:02 PM | #14 |
sergeant hatred
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ottawa
Moto: The bus
Posts: 2,723
|
Sportbike then cruiser.
I have ridden with a guy on a Maurader 800, and he could keep up to anyone on a sportbike up to about 100mph in the turns.(his bike would not go much faster)
__________________
My wife was afraid of the dark...then she saw me naked and now she's afraid of the light. |
11-25-2009, 02:35 PM | #15 |
Keyboard Racer
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mile High City
Moto: Old Superbikes
Posts: 1,016
|
I think it depends more on the rider's location. If someone lived in the middle of Kansas, they may never ride uphill, downhill, or around a curve.
|
11-25-2009, 02:36 PM | #16 | |
Ornery, scandalous & evil
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Moto: 2004 Scarlet R1
Posts: 5,962
|
Quote:
Seat time is important, but VARIETY of the types of miles ridden while in the seat is what makes a well rounded rider, IMO. |
|
11-25-2009, 05:25 PM | #17 | |
Spiker bike
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: KCK
Moto: KZ750
Posts: 1,629
|
Quote:
But having lived in the Ozarks, I do know what a curve is, and I miss them.
__________________
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol. ~Author Unknown |
|
11-25-2009, 05:28 PM | #18 |
Spiker bike
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: KCK
Moto: KZ750
Posts: 1,629
|
I think those that have spent time on both bikes make the best riders.
Having rode both, I can say that my skills are much better than if I had just stayed on a cruiser.
__________________
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol. ~Author Unknown |
11-25-2009, 09:02 PM | #19 | |
TWFix Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
|
Quote:
I mean riding on the street takes more than just being able to handle your machine well. if someone who rides track day in and out... goes to the street... with no street experience... they're gonna be in for a rude awakening the first time they get into traffic. they're not gonna be watching the right places to give them an advantage (ie watching drivers movements in the car) I agree as far as handling the bike... a track rider will be better... that's why we go to the track... to eliminate all the other distractions. back to the original question: I don't think one will lead to a better rider over the other... the bikes are so different... I mean you can't even say that the cruiser would be more forgiving to learn to ride on... as changing to a sport bike... that throttle is way different... maybe someone who's swapped back and forth would have better input. |
|
11-26-2009, 03:25 AM | #20 |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
^^^Yeah he needs to further define better...better could mean no accidents, ability to go around cones, do figure 8's, lap times at a track etc. etc.
To me a better rider is the one who knows to handle a motorcycle under all conditions.
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM Last edited by 101lifts2; 11-30-2009 at 04:39 PM.. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|