Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2013, 06:26 PM   #61
fasternyou929
SFL Expatriate #2
 
fasternyou929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CasterTroy View Post
Elitist, educated, 2% bastard with your big words, and knowledge n' stuff!
Aw, nobody's ever called me educated before. Swoon...
fasternyou929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 03:37 PM   #62
Turbo Ghost
Movie Star
 
Turbo Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kingsport, TN.
Moto: KLR650
Posts: 682
Default

Not knocking on your purchase or anything. Just making a statement.

Unless you are in competition of some sort, I never understood the point of buying a stainless prop for freshwater use. Saltwater will eat one up but, freshwater won't and in lakes and rivers you always run the risk of hitting a log, stump, rock, etc. One good hit with a stainless prop and you've just lost your whole lower unit! (heh-heh...I said "lower unit") An aluminum prop will sacrifice itself and do no damage to the transmission. I've had two instances in the past 20 years where the prop hit rocks when we thought we were in the clear. Both times, the prop folded-up like a tulip and did no other damage. A stainless prop would have probably snapped the output shaft or worse! Just my thoughts on the matter. Carry on.
Turbo Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 03:42 PM   #63
Krabill
WERA Yellow Plate
 
Krabill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Moto: 08 WR250R, 12 XTZ1200
Posts: 558
Default

A stainless prop will chew through a log with little to no damage to the prop, but will break expensive things if you hit a rock. An aluminum prop will break or bend if you hit a rock, saving the expensive bits.

Lakes with logs = stainless prop

Lakes with rocks = aluminum prop
Krabill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 07:42 PM   #64
Turbo Ghost
Movie Star
 
Turbo Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kingsport, TN.
Moto: KLR650
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krabill View Post
Lakes with logs = stainless prop

Lakes with rocks = aluminum prop
Ours are full of both!
Turbo Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 07:59 PM   #65
fasternyou929
SFL Expatriate #2
 
fasternyou929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeNetworX View Post
Pitch is how far it will travel forward in one complete rotation, in inches. So I went from 19" to 17", with the objective being to get more spin in a same linear distance, thus providing more thrust powering up from an idle, to ease in pulling a skier/wakeboarder up out of the water faster. Hope I'm explaining it correctly, this stuff is relatively new to me.
Don't know why but this thread randomly popped into my head today. I'm no boating expert (as I'm about to prove), but wouldn't 19" of forward motion per rotation give you a better wholeshot and pop a skier out of the water quicker? I am definitely missing something though, because by that definition a 19" would provide better accelleration AND higher top speed than a 17" rather than a trade-off.

I assume there are some fluid dynamics that come into play similar to HP and Torque, I'm just having trouble visualizing which pitch favors which.
fasternyou929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 08:28 PM   #66
'73 H1 Triple
restorer of the original
 
'73 H1 Triple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zionsville,PA
Moto: '93 ZR1100 &'73 Kawasaki H1 500
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fasternyou929 View Post
Don't know why but this thread randomly popped into my head today. I'm no boating expert (as I'm about to prove), but wouldn't 19" of forward motion per rotation give you a better wholeshot and pop a skier out of the water quicker? I am definitely missing something though, because by that definition a 19" would provide better accelleration AND higher top speed than a 17" rather than a trade-off.

I assume there are some fluid dynamics that come into play similar to HP and Torque, I'm just having trouble visualizing which pitch favors which.
A 19" pitch prop will have a slower holeshot versus a 17" pitch. Think of the 19" as highway gears and the 17" as drag gears.

On my 4.3L powered 18' Celebrity, I added a "whale tail" to the lower unit. At the expense of about 2 mph on top end, I get much better hole shots ( made a BIG difference pulling water skiers) and increased stabilty in rough water ( less rocking)
'73 H1 Triple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 01:19 AM   #67
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fasternyou929 View Post
Don't know why but this thread randomly popped into my head today. I'm no boating expert (as I'm about to prove), but wouldn't 19" of forward motion per rotation give you a better wholeshot and pop a skier out of the water quicker? I am definitely missing something though, because by that definition a 19" would provide better accelleration AND higher top speed than a 17" rather than a trade-off.

I assume there are some fluid dynamics that come into play similar to HP and Torque, I'm just having trouble visualizing which pitch favors which.
If the engine wasn't fighting against friction and mass you would be right. With those in play the 19" is going to accelerate slower and take longer to get up on plane.

To compare it to something you are more familiar with look at motorcycles. Using the same logic 6th gear (19") would give better acceleration and top speed than 1st (17") since 6th gives more forward motion per rotation than 1st. For essentially the same reasons as a boat accelerating the mass of the bike and overcoming friction means this is not the case.
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 11:11 AM   #68
Turbo Ghost
Movie Star
 
Turbo Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kingsport, TN.
Moto: KLR650
Posts: 682
Default

Then of course, you have to walk the fine line between thrust and cavitation! Too shallow a pitch and the prop will rip through the water and not gain any forward traction for the force applied. It's like everything else, it's a trade-off between holeshot and top speed. As previously mentioned, whale-tails make a huge difference in holeshot at the expense of top-end. They also help make slightly smoother wake for wakeboarders and the like.
Turbo Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 11:39 AM   #69
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

I understand why a whale tail would reduce top end but how would it help with holeshot? Does it reduce cavitation or a rolling of the boat from torque?

I had a whale tail on my 16'er as a kid but my dad put it on there to reduce the "porpoising" and add stability when the engine was trimmed up at speed.
__________________
Racing For Smiles
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 12:37 PM   #70
Turbo Ghost
Movie Star
 
Turbo Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kingsport, TN.
Moto: KLR650
Posts: 682
Default

All of the above. It keeps air from being pulled-in from above at take-off and helps keep the drive more level at the same time. They definitely help with porpoising! I had that problem with a Waverunner and put an extended ride-plate on it and cured it right away! For the ski-boat, tabs will also help.
Turbo Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.