Man shoots 18-yr old having sex with 16-yr old stepdaughter.

[Trip]

Originally Posted by Tmall

Either way, this moron is going to go to jail. All because he got pissed that somebody was fucking his little girl.

It's not even his little girl, it's someone else's little girl.

[CasterTroy]

Originally Posted by Trip

It's not even his little girl, it's someone else's little girl.

I have my own little girl, as well as "someone else's little girl" and as a parent of BOTH I can tell you I don’t see a distinction between my girls 99.9% of the time.

Though I wouldn’t SHOOT the boy, I would do something pretty awful, like rape him with a plunger handle or staple his sac to his thigh just because that’s embarrassing and not something that’s likely going to get reported.

Though that’s just anger-speak and more than likely I’d do nothing but charge him with rape

[z06boy]

Originally Posted by CasterTroy

I have my own little girl, as well as "someone else's little girl" and as a parent of BOTH I can tell you I don’t see a distinction between my girls 99.9% of the time.

Though I wouldn’t SHOOT the boy, I would do something pretty awful, like rape him with a plunger handle or staple his sac to his thigh just because that’s embarrassing and not something that’s likely going to get reported.

Though that’s just anger-speak and more than likely I’d do nothing but charge him with rape

Ok serious question...if the boy is 18 and your daughter is 16 you would charge him...even if it was consensual ?

Don't get me wrong...I would be pizzed too but having him arrested if she was willing ? Man I guess I could have been charged when I was 18 looking back.

Now if it's an older guy...a teacher...blah blah blah I understand but I'm just thinking about a 2 year difference.

[EpyonXero]

Originally Posted by z06boy

Ok serious question...if the boy is 18 and your daughter is 16 you would charge him...even if it was consensual ?

Don't get me wrong...I would be pizzed too but having him arrested if she was willing ? Man I guess I could have been charged when I was 18 looking back.

Now if it's an older guy...a teacher...blah blah blah I understand but I'm just thinking about a 2 year difference.

A charge like that would ruin a kid's life.

[pauldun170]

Originally Posted by CasterTroy

I would do something pretty awful, like rape him with a plunger handle or staple his sac to his thigh just because that’s embarrassing and not something that’s likely going to get reported.

Though that’s just anger-speak and more than likely I’d do nothing but charge him with rape

So you are saying that you would touch his buttocks, handle his scrotum and look at his anus?


dude....

thats f'ed up

[Homeslice]

For those who would charge the guy......Are you saying there's really that big of a difference between a 17-y/o and an 18 y/o guy? The law says its cool if he was 16 or 17, but all of a sudden when he becomes 18 you'd charge him? Pretty retarded IMO.

Let me ask you something, what percent of 16-y/o girls do you think are still virgins? Maybe 50% at the most? So that means the other 50% have had sex with SOMEONE.....so what difference does it make whether the guy was 16, or 18? Don't act like you weren't banging 16 y/o girls.......Are you supposed to suddenly stop doing so when you turn 18? Retarded.

[wildchild]

Originally Posted by Trip

It's not even his little girl, it's someone else's little girl.

maybe he was jealous, didn't have a chance at her himself yet.

funny weren't a bunch of folks here totally in favor of a father hitting a boy with a pipe for the same thing but now because he shoots it's wrong?

don't get me wrong I think it's totally wrong and he'll go to jail but I thought the pipe thing was wrong too.

[OneSickPsycho]

Originally Posted by wildchild

maybe he was jealous, didn't have a chance at her himself yet.

funny weren't a bunch of folks here totally in favor of a father hitting a boy with a pipe for the same thing but now because he shoots it's wrong?

don't get me wrong I think it's totally wrong and he'll go to jail but I thought the pipe thing was wrong too.

By all accounts, this is a completely different story... That other guy didn't confront the kid, he just assumed his daughter was being raped and knocked the dude with the pipe.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by wildchild

maybe he was jealous, didn't have a chance at her himself yet.

funny weren't a bunch of folks here totally in favor of a father hitting a boy with a pipe for the same thing but now because he shoots it's wrong?

don't get me wrong I think it's totally wrong and he'll go to jail but I thought the pipe thing was wrong too.

Like OSP stated, its a different story. However, if you go in to another man's house and fuck his daughter and get caught you should expect to get hit, but not shot to death. Violence= Good, Deadly force = Bad.

This world needs more punching.

[wildchild]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

Like OSP stated, its a different story. However, if you go in to another man's house and fuck his daughter and get caught you should expect to get hit, but not shot to death. Violence= Good, Deadly force = Bad.

This world needs more punching.

this may not be the general consensus but, I personally would consider it easier to kill someone who is within range of a pipe. one well placed swing and done. (for those who need very literal explanations, I am not saying a pipe is more dangerous then a gun, only that a person in close range and in my house would be more likely to recieve deadly force as opposed to being out in the yard at distance)

both dads knew what was going on, they just had "I would kill him" thoughts of grandeur running through their brain rather then the common sense thoughts that every teenage girl in the world is going to get bagged by someone at sometime. Both were idiots in my opinion.