Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2009, 09:39 AM   #21
Papa_Complex
Nomadic Tribesman
 
Papa_Complex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
Default

If it isn't enough to buy a large island or a small Central American country, then I don't want it.
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising"

http://www.morallyambiguous.net/
Papa_Complex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 10:34 AM   #22
Rsv1000R
WERA White Plate
 
Rsv1000R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
Default

You have to pay Fed, State, and Local taxes.
That $89M isn't after all taxes, If the lump sum payout is $115M, Fed taxes alone are going to be close to $40M.
Rsv1000R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:38 AM   #23
Amber Lamps
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rsv1000R View Post
You have to pay Fed, State, and Local taxes.
That $89M isn't after all taxes, If the lump sum payout is $115M, Fed taxes alone are going to be close to $40M.
Um nope, I just watched it on the news last night, it's 88.5 after all taxes.
Amber Lamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:41 AM   #24
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TIGGER View Post
Um nope, I just watched it on the news last night, it's 88.5 after all taxes.
See my previous post.

$115M would put you in the 35% bracket, which equals $40.25M in Federal taxes plus any applicable state, local, etc.

They may have withheld less than that but it doesn't mean he won't owe them come 4-15-2010.

Edit: just noticed, The $115M number came from Trip, not a reputable source.

The $88.5 may be a true net number but that would mean his lump sum payout was far greater than $115M.
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:46 AM   #25
Rsv1000R
WERA White Plate
 
Rsv1000R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TIGGER View Post
Um nope, I just watched it on the news last night, it's 88.5 after all taxes.
You do the math on 35% then.

Plus in Ohio I pay iirc ~7% state taxes, and I also pay another 2% to the village I live in. That puts my total taxes at ~44%.
Rsv1000R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:46 AM   #26
Amber Lamps
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shmike View Post
See my previous post.

$115M would put you in the 35% bracket, which equals $40.25M in Federal taxes plus any applicable state, local, etc.

They may have withheld less than that but it doesn't mean he won't owe them come 4-15-2010.

Edit: just noticed, The $115M number came from Trip, not a reputable source.

The $88.5 may be a true net number but that would mean his lump sum payout was far greater than $115M.

Well I got it from the news which isn't necessarily a perfect source of information either! They were making a big deal out of the fact that he's 23 and lives on a large ranch. They had his picture all over the screen and even video of his house and property! There is no way I'd let them do that! I'd sneak in, get my loot and sneak out if it were me!
Amber Lamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:47 AM   #27
Rider
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
Default

$89 mil is still a lot of money. A conservative investment with a return of only 5% will earn you $4.45 mil a year. I can live comfortably on that and never have to touch the principle.
Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:49 AM   #28
shmike
Follower
 
shmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rider View Post
$89 mil is still a lot of money. A conservative investment with a return of only 5% will earn you $445K/ a year. I can live comfortably on that and never have to touch the principle.
Ninja edit FTW.

Many people would be glad to have a return of "only" 5% over the last few years.
shmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:49 AM   #29
Amber Lamps
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rsv1000R View Post
You do the math on 35% then.

Plus in Ohio I pay iirc ~7% state taxes, and I also pay another 2% to the village I live in. That puts my total taxes at ~44%.
35% of what? I don't know what the lump sum pay out was... do you? The total was 232 million, normally I believe that the lump sum penalty is half or maybe less...
Amber Lamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 11:54 AM   #30
Rider
Moto GP Star
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shmike View Post
Ninja edit FTW.

Many people would be glad to have a return of "only" 5% over the last few years.
Too many zero's so early in the morning. LOL

The last few years yes but if you look at many mutual funds over their lifetime they are well above 5%.
Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.