|
06-16-2010, 05:13 PM | #1 |
Better half of Gas Man
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SE, MI
Moto: '09 Harley Nightster
Posts: 178
|
|
06-16-2010, 09:45 PM | #2 |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
|
06-23-2010, 09:37 AM | #3 |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Oh very true. And most are electric.
|
06-25-2010, 06:34 PM | #4 | |
Keyboard Racer
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mile High City
Moto: Old Superbikes
Posts: 1,016
|
Quote:
As for building a 70's era cafe bike, I compared my 79 GS1000 specs against the XR1200: Dry weight: XR: 564 lbs. GS: 507lbs. Wheelbase: XR: 60.0 inches. GS: 59.3 inches HP: XR: 79.2 @ 7,000 RPM. GS: 85 @ 8,000 RPM. Torque: XR: 68.7 @ 3,600. GS: 59 @ 6,500. 1/4 mile: XR: 12.13. GS: 12.0. The XR is like a 70's era bike. But if I had a friend who wanted to build a cafe bike I would tell him to get a 1980 or so GS1100. They were quicker than the 1200 Bandit. |
|
06-26-2010, 09:20 AM | #5 | ||
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Moto: Ninja 650R
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
06-26-2010, 10:11 AM | #6 | |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
Here is a good review from someones blog, it pretty much sums up everything that has been said here
http://dryohe.wordpress.com/2010/01/...vidson-xr1200/ Quote:
__________________
|
|
06-26-2010, 01:47 PM | #7 |
Keyboard Racer
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mile High City
Moto: Old Superbikes
Posts: 1,016
|
To be fair, Cycle World's 1/4 mile time was 12.13, a full second quicker than Bike Magazine. And their 0-60 time was 3.9 seconds, compared to Bike's 4.34 sec. The weird thing is Bike's 90.1 HP compared to Cycle World's 79.2.
In Cycle World's report, they compared the XR1200 to Ducati's Sport Classic Sport 1000. Surprisingly, both bike were comparable. The Ducati's stiff suspension made it a killer in corners, but the highway ride was too stiff. They gave the nod to the Harley. The short-travel (3 1/2 inch) rear shock was a problem on the XR. But that can be fixed. The high, wide handlebar on the XR made it easier to handle than the narrow, clubman-style clip-ons of the Ducati. Although the XR has more HP and Torque, the 130 pound weight difference made the Harley slower in the quarter. But here's the clincher: "The Sportster's big-time midrange torque helps it to be an amazingly easy bike to hustle along a twisty road." That would be a selling point to me. |
06-26-2010, 03:54 PM | #8 |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
Instead of talking shit perhaps some of you tools should ride the bike, rather than rely on misconceptions and stereotypes.
|
06-26-2010, 04:42 PM | #9 |
Aspiring Rapper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
|
|
06-26-2010, 05:08 PM | #10 |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
Can I be shit talker number 2?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|