![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Let go of my ears.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Moto: '03 GSX-R600, '04 625SMC
Posts: 1,394
|
![]()
Yep, that's about right.
Quote:
See two posts above. The only way I could actually get my leg under the air scoop thingy on the side was to have my foot WAY back on the rearsets, my toes were barely on the peg. I couldn't move my foot forward to shift without taking my foot off the peg and readjusting my leg. Maybe too small isn't the right term, maybe it's just too cramped. Other than that I was impressed with the bike, it was a fun hooligan to ride.
__________________
![]() Entia non sunt multiplicanda necessitatem |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I give Squids a bad name
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fly Over State
Moto: 1996 CBR600 F3 (AKA the Flying Turd)
Posts: 4,742
|
![]()
A buddy of ours that is probably 5'9" and 400lbs sat on one and it's his favorite bike. Of course he needs that over my old SecaII
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Let go of my ears.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Moto: '03 GSX-R600, '04 625SMC
Posts: 1,394
|
![]()
Yeah, it's a hell of a step up from a Seca II! I like the idea of the bike, a hooligan naked busa, and it's certainly fun to ride. But the execution of the concept is a little flawed IMO. The weird thing is when you're actually on the bike it's nowhere near as "big". Your chinbar blocks almost everything from the dash back so it looks slimmer, and it certainly doesn't ride like it's that fat.
__________________
![]() Entia non sunt multiplicanda necessitatem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|