Team Chicago 03/29-03/30/08

Mudpuppy · 04-03-2008, 10:24 PM

well i know 532 to 520 was a big change for me on the r6.. i kept stock gearing because i didn't want to lose any top end and didn't really think the trade off to get minimal acceleration gain was really worth it.. now that i know what's involved in the change and the time it takes i might try -1 in front if i ever feel like fucking with it. I have other shit to do to the bike and I am happy with it for now.

04-03-2008, 10:24 PM	#26
Mudpuppy South of Heaven Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan Moto: 2006 Yamaha R1 50th Anniversary Edition Posts: 1,491	well i know 532 to 520 was a big change for me on the r6.. i kept stock gearing because i didn't want to lose any top end and didn't really think the trade off to get minimal acceleration gain was really worth it.. now that i know what's involved in the change and the time it takes i might try -1 in front if i ever feel like fucking with it. I have other shit to do to the bike and I am happy with it for now. __________________ Mudpuppy Redline Superbike http://www.redlinesuperbike.com/ Learn about photography: ATP Members